Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Good education and conversion

By Michael Jensen - posted Wednesday, 11 November 2015


Should children in government schools be subjected to ideas and ideologies in such a way as they are persuaded by them?

Certainly, that is the hope of the Feminist Collective at Fitzroy High School in Victoria, who have created a new curriculum called 'Fightback'. As the report in The Age states: "Students taking the course are asked to reflect on their experience of objectification, compare images of famous men and women in the media, deconstruct sexist cartoons, and debunk "hairy armpit" myths about feminists."

The course, which started off as a lunch time group, is now being offered as an elective at Fitzroy High. Teacher Briony O'Keeffe is hoping that the course will be offered now in many more schools, and is seeking to persuade others to take it up.

Advertisement

And why not? In the face of the alarming statistics about domestic violence and rape, and the ongoing inequalities in pay, and many more social disadvantages that women face, it would seem like a good thing to have an optional class in which some students at least can be introduced to a fairly mainstream feminist take on things.

Only: let's not pretend that this is anything but what it is.

It is proselytizing.

If we understand 'to proselytize' as the Oxford English Dictionary does, "To convert or attempt to convert from one opinion, religion, or party, etc., to another", then that is exactly what is going on here. And I wish them every success.

The course is giving an ideological take on a social issue. It is one that is much debated and not universally accepted, even amongst those who might call themselves feminist. It doesn't simply really on statistical or empirical data, but on a way of describing things that is driven by a particular ideology.

My point is not to take issue with the particular ideology being presented by the 'Fightback' course. And I am sure that the course is offered in an educationally responsible way which engages the students in critical thinking and discussion.

Advertisement

But I am also sure that it is a course in which there is a 'right' answer – a view on the way things are that is a given, and that the authors of the course want to persuade others is true. If you disagree before you take the course, the hope is that by the end you will have changed your mind and your behaviour.

And what's wrong with that? I would say: nothing at all. Education without persuasion is an impoverished, hollow thing, a matter of 'just the facts', to quote Dickens' character Mr Gradgrind. We want our children to be exposed to teachers who have opinions, even strong opinions, and even opinions with which we disagree. Respect for disagreement is what is needed, not the illusion of an opinion-less, ideology-free perspective

I would hope that these teachers make their opinions attractive. I would hope that government schools can offer a way in which students can engage with ideological, political, and religious opinions and with people who actually hold them.

After all, it would be a shame to study feminism, and never encounter a feminist.

Of course, what I am trying to show is that there is a rather unobjectionable meaning of the word 'proselytize' which describes an aspect of education with which most people are unconcerned. That is: we hope that education persuades children, and especially teenagers, to change their opinions, and so develop as reasoning adults who are capable of mature citizenship.

The more common, and certainly pejorative use of the word describes a kind of manipulative and deceptive kind of persuasion. It names our dark fears about religious cults, or brainwashing political camps. We think of proselytizers as those slightly unhinged and unwashed characters who stand on street corners handing out tracts, or as those who knock on our doors with name badges on, or as fanatics like Jim Jones.

It is this meaning of the word that is used whenever religion is discussed in connection with education, especially by those who would be rid of religion in schools. Yet, as I have shown here, simply being attractive and persuasive of a certain opinion is not necessarily anti-educational.

If the word in its pejorative sense is used to cover all forms of persuasion in education, then I think that we risk missing something vitally important about education itself: that opinions, ideological positions, frameworks, metanarratives, faith-positions, world-views – call them what you will – are essential to the human process of knowing about and dealing with and living together in the world.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

23 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Jensen is the rector of St Mark's Anglican Church at Darling Point. He has a doctorate in Moral Theology from Oxford University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Jensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 23 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy