Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Reasons for changing marriage remain flawed

By Murray Campbell - posted Friday, 10 July 2015


Please hear me carefully, I am not saying that we must oppose same-sex marriage because it might lead to an even further dilution of marriage, my point is that the case for same-sex marriage is inherently flawed. The espoused 'equal love' cry is not an argument for monogamous life-long marriages, but an argument for embracing any kind of genuinely loving relationship as marriage.

Penny Wong is among several notable Australians who have mocked any connection between monogamous and polygamous marriage, but it is the very rationale she insists upon that is rationally being taken up by others. We are being naive if we ignore the fact that within hours of the Supreme Court decision in the United States, the pro-polyamorous brigade turned up the volume. Professor Fredrik deBoerof Prude University wrote, "Now that we've defined that love and devotion and family isn't driven by gender alone, why should it be limited to just two individuals? The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy".

In Australia there are community leaders advocating pushing beyond what the current bills before Parliament are intending. Earlier this year Simon Copland, a columnist with the Sydney Star Observer, published on the SBS the view that equal marriage might unfortunately limit expressions of sexuality, saying that 'while monogamous marriage still works for many, our society is increasingly questioning whether it should remain as the only option'.

Advertisement

Only last year, NSW District Court Judge, Garry Neilson, stated that 'the "only reason" that incest is still a crime is because of the high risk of genetic abnormalities in children born from consanguineous relationships'. Yes, he was reprimanded for his comments, but the fact remains that society's views on marriage have so disintegrated that he felt comfortable to share this opinion in an Australian courtroom.

My question is: what is it about marriage that, in the eyes of gay marriage advocates, makes some loving relationships fit the criteria and not others? If marriage is simply about recognising 'equal love' then it is incongruous to refuse polyamorous and incestuous marriages to those who desire them. However, if marriage is more than simply 'equal love', what are those other essential ingredients that properly define it as marriage?

Truth be told, the reasoning for change is big on emotion and little on substance. Given that this is the case, it would not only be unwise but incongruous for Australia to change the universal and historic understanding of marriage.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Murray is Senior Minister at Mentone Baptist Church in Melbourne, When there's time he's also drinking coffee, supporting Carlton and listening to Bach. Follow Murray on twitter @MurrayJCampbell

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Murray Campbell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Murray Campbell
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy