Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Latham slams Labor's same-sex marriage romance

By Ben-Peter Terpstra - posted Monday, 15 June 2015

Mark Latham has slammed the ALP's culture of identity politics, including its romance with same-sex marriage. Writing for Fairfax's Financial Review, the former Labor leader advances the view that his party is out of touch with mainstream voters.

"The tragedy of modern Labor is that it no longer talks about poverty," argues Latham. "It's too busy fussing about gay marriage, defending the rights of heroin traffickers and facilitating asylum-seeker drownings to tackle the problems of public housing estates (such as Mount Druitt on SBS's Struggle Street)."

Young political hopefuls, he proffers, also need to "stop knocking around with privileged feminists and other identity-urgers and recapture the true meaning of social justice."


Same-sex marriage, to be sure, remains an ice-cream headache for the ALP. In the recent past, Bill Shorten rebuked Tanya Plibersek's plans to ban a conscience vote for Laborties while demanding one for Liberals.

Former Labor PM and atheist Julia Gillard, by way of contrast, opposed same-sex marriage on traditional feminist grounds.

And who could forget former PM Kevin Rudd's remarkable flip-flops? The alternative Christian was ridiculed for his unorthodox conversion to "marriage equality" against the teachings of mainstream Christianity. Moreover, media predictions that KRudd's decision would win Labor thousands of youth voters were more about wishful thinking.

Even same-sex marriage fans have sarcastically aired their disapproval of Labor's processes and priorities. News Corp's Chris Kenny, puts it this way: "As they say, if you look after the tampon tax and gay marriage, the budget deficit and national security will look after themselves."

More importantly, though, typical voters don't rate "gay marriage" as a priority. In weighed data collected by the ABC, for instance, 250,000 respondents were focused on issues such as the economy, so-called asylum seekers and health/hospitals etc.

Another problem for Labor: Thoughtful progressive and conservative critics alike are questioning the party's marriage logic. How can Labor be for "marriage equality" when it seeks to privilege two-person unions? If love-feelings alone make a marriage, then why are polygamous folks forced to sit at the back of the bus? And who buys Shorten's view that Australia is a rogue nation for upholding traditional marriage? After all, only 8.5% of UN countries have redefined marriage, not 91.5%.


Also significant: Twelve national and international tribunals in eleven countries have explicitly upheld male-female marriage as consistent with human rights.

Revealingly, gay unions are more likely to dissolve, according to solid science. So is Shorten selling false hopes to homosexuals while dismissing children's rights? Indeed, same-sex unions are breaking up at such a rapid rate in some places that they're already beating dysfunctional Scandinavian heterosexuals. In Norway, male-gay marriages are 50 % more likely to end in divorce than straight marriages. That figure jumps to 167% for lesbian marriages!

A case of good intentions gone wrong or narcissistic adults-first libertarianism? The fact that Shorten isn't prepared to even acknowledge same-sex breakup rates is telling.

Of course, prominent gays and feminists, from Dolce and Gabbana to Germaine Greer have come out against "marriage equality" spin, whereas Latham's stand highlights the fact that within the ALP, same-sex marriage is still a contentious issue.

As Latham told 3AW Drive, Laborites have lost their moral compass. They're not focused on key social justice issues. "They're obsessed, instead, by gay marriage." Indeed. "It's a legal document. It's a piece of symbolism. It might make some people feel better to have a marriage document but it really is a low order priority," Latham says. "On the Richter scale of social justice Struggle Street is a 10, gay marriage is a point one."

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

This article was first published on Catallaxy.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

58 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben-Peter Terpstra has provided commentary for The Daily Caller (Washington D.C.), NewsReal Blog (Los Angeles), Quadrant (Sydney), and Menzies House (Adelaide).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben-Peter Terpstra

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 58 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy