Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Budget bills Generation AA

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 13 May 2015


Because of the situation in the Senate it is difficult to see Abbott managing to get anything but a big spending budget passed.

Here Labor is the problem as without its support the cross benches have no power of veto.

But unlike Howard during the Hawke years, Shorten is not interested in playing an honourable hand and allowing good reform to pass.

Advertisement

This is partly because it’s not his inclination (and in fact Howard is the only Opposition Leader who has put partisan advantage aside for good policy) but also because the modern Labor Party does not seem to recognise what good economic policy is.

The Rudd/Gillard style of economic management was shambolic with a huge increase in outlays which they tried unsuccessfully to fund by mugging power consumers and the mining industry, both measures which decreased national productivity and efficiency.

This budget will be criticised as “unfair”, which is code for “someone lost a benefit”. Such criticisms are without substance. You need a double entry approach to fairness. For everyone who gains a benefit there is someone who pays for it, who may well be in need themselves.

Those payers are not the current generation, but future generations who will have to pay the debt back at some stage either through cash or inflation.

This is an unfair budget, and an unfair generation (assuming its politicians are representative of it), as it is not only eating the past – the surpluses and assets laid up by those who have gone before – but it is eating the future – which should belong to its children.

Not sure what the younger generation will say when it realises what a mess its parents are making, but it could make for interesting retirements for those of us who are in our 50s and 60s.

Advertisement

They will not be happy, nor should they be.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy