Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

El Modelo

By Kellie Tranter - posted Monday, 16 March 2015


It’s no secret that sovereign wealth funds bid for state owned commercial enterprises in Australia, such as NSW ports and coal mines. They will do the same with privatised government services.  Late last year an investigation by the Independent revealed that ‘foreign governments are making hundreds of millions of pounds a year in this way running British public services.  With Britain’s energy, transport and utility networks run by companies owned by other European governments, foreign exchequers reap the dividends while UK customers struggle with increasing fares and bills.’

We seem to be heading down the same path, and the details are regularly hidden behind "commercial in confidence" claims even though it's we citizens and taxpayers, through the government that represents us, who are the real party to the transactions.

Unfortunately there is little objective information or analysis available to ordinary Australians to permit us to rationally assess the claims of politicians. The media comes in in fits and starts but essentially follows the 24 hour news cycle in terms of responding to particular statements or announcements.  Labor politicians can't seem to do much better. Academic economists who produce informed and historically revealing critiques of government assertions and policies, including studies of overseas privatisations, aren't widely published and are derided by right wing think tanks and the conservative press. And the agenda that Tony Abbott promised to implement in his speech to the Institute of Public Affairs in 2013 no longer gets a mention, even though it clearly shows the path he is following. 

Advertisement

Without objective critical analysis or informed debate the Washington Consensus principles of fiscal austerity, privatisation and liberalisation are likely to be implemented in Australia.  The economic consequences are likely to be a boon for the wealthy - including overseas "investors" - and increased costs and rising inequality for the ordinary Australian citizen, as overseas experience has shown.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kellie Tranter is a lawyer and human rights activist. You can follow her on Twitter @KellieTranter

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kellie Tranter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kellie Tranter
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy