Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Gary John's pragmatism belies more sinister ideologies

By Clara Geoghegan - posted Friday, 2 January 2015


The idea of children as a personal indulgence undercuts the promotion of common social values and encourages self-serving individualism. Children are now a product for personal satisfaction rather than an investment in the nation's future.

Perhaps Johns should look at alternatives to current social disengagement. An education system that caters to a broader stake-holder base. Better post-school training. Job availability – perhaps something to replace the huge loss of the motor industry, the effects of which are yet to hit our economy. Great to suggest the unemployed should postpone children until they can afford them. They might be waiting a lifetime.

Some of these ideas are presented as pragmatic approaches to current issues, but there are even more sinister ideological issues at play.

Advertisement

Gary Johns might like to revisit the manifesto of the Eugenics Society of Victoria founded in 1936. A key activist in this society was Richard Berry, professor of Anatomy at the University of Melbourne. These views were also prominent in the work of Margaret Sangster, the founder of Planned Parenthood. Initially, 'respectable' people did not use contraception but it was seen as a means of controlling the less desirable social groups. Eventually it became promoted as a 'common good'.

The Eugenics Society of Victoria and its predecessor the Eugenics Education Society supported a number of Mental Deficiency Bills in the Victorian Parliament. These Bills were presented in 1926, 1929 and 1939 by Premier Stanley Argyle a close friend of Berry's. They aimed to institutionalise and potentially sterilise a significant proportion of the population - those seen as inefficient. Included in the group were slum dwellers, homosexuals, prostitutes, alcoholics, as well as those with small heads and with low IQs. The Aboriginal population was also seen to fall within this group.

These ideas lost momentum and became an embarrassment after their escalation in Nazi Germany and the ensuing Holocaust – and the extermination of gypsies, homosexuals, and other minorities.

The targeted social groupings might have changed, but the sentiments espoused by Johns are the same. To seriously entertain his proposal is to embark on a dangerous route.

Further sinister underpinnings are the racist and sexist attitudes in Johns only being able to provide example examples of aboriginal women to support his argument. Never mind that the fathers of many children of aboriginal women are white men. Compulsory contraception and sterilization of aboriginal women is not a solution for solving complex problems. It is a band-aid approach that is hugely insulting to human dignity. Indeed, compulsory contraception can mask more serious issues of sexual abuse in certain communities.

Further, has Johns given any thought towhat will happen to children conceived while their parents are on benefits? Compulsory abortion? Compulsory adoption? Or will they be allowed to perish in poverty until another wit, such as Jonathon Swift publishes another "Modest Proposal"?

Advertisement

Clara Staffa Geoghegan is a freelance writer and educator. She has also worked as a policy advisor.

.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

64 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Clara Geoghegan is an educator. She works with a range of organisations. He opinions are her own. The rule of thumb she gives her teenage children is: if you can’t tell them to their face you should not publish it on Facebook and if the language is not suitable for your grandparents it is not suitable for anyone.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Clara Geoghegan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 64 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy