Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Do Jim and the Greens want to sell coal to India?

By Geoff Russell - posted Monday, 20 October 2014


Alternatively, if we'd followed the French model and rolled out nuclear in the 70s and 80s then we'd have produced about 3,750 million tonnes less CO2. We'd also have more uranium mines and few, if any, coal mines. We'd be exporting uranium and the entire planet would be much better off. Locally, we wouldn't have trashed the Hunter valley and we wouldn't now be digging the heart out of Queensland with huge coal mines and threatening to put more pressure on the Great Barrier Reef. You don't need big mines and big ports and big railways to handle uranium. We'd have no gas fracking.

On the negative side, had Australia gone nuclear with France we could have expected as many fatal nuclear accidents as France.

But what if we got hit by a tsunami, like Japan?

Advertisement

Before frothing at the mouth with worry about that, you might like to consider Guarapari beach in Brazil. You can have a look at the place on youtube here. This is far more radioactive than anywhere around Fukushima but has it been evacuated? No. Were sick and elderly people killed by being hurriedly thrown onto buses in the middle of the night? No. Is there despair and suicide and lives destroyed? No. All that stuff is a consequence not of radiation or the Fukushima meltdown, but of fear mongering by the anti-nuclear movement. A radiation expert from Imperial College in London recently described the Fukushima evacuation as "stark raving mad". I think he was being excessively polite. Why has nuclear fear, sometimes manifested as an obsessive compulsive phobia, driven such cruel and stupid actions? My recently published book GreenJacked has been endorsed by Nobel Prize Winner Peter Doherty and explains how the anti-nuclear movement has ignored about 30 years of science about cancer and persists with obsolete rubbish long known to be false.

All that is required for lunacy to have horrible consequences is for people with knowledge to speak so bloody softly that their words are lost in the din. That's been happening a lot for the past 30 years.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

36 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff is a mathematician and computer programmer and is a member of Animal Liberation SA. He has been published in The Monthly, The Age, Australasian Science, Independent Weekly and Dissent. His latest book GreenJacked has just been published.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Russell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Geoff Russell
Article Tools
Comment 36 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy