Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Costly blow-out in Australia's debt

By Alan Austin - posted Wednesday, 1 October 2014


The Abbott Government seems to have abandoned its pre-election commitment to reducing the nation's "skyrocketing debt". Borrowings have increased dramatically since the last election.

Now we know by how much.

Debt has increased by 13.7% over Labor's levels. Interest payments have risen a staggering 28.6% to more than thirty million dollars per day. In just the first ten months.

Advertisement

The Final Budget Outcome 2013-14 was released last week by Treasurer Joe Hockey and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann. Buried in the long-awaited document is confirmation that net government debt at the end of June, ten months after the Coalition took office, has risen to $202.46 billion. (Table 11, page 20.) That's quite a blow-out.

The last monthly Finance Department report prepared under the previous Labor Government, for 31 August 2013, showed forecast end of year net debt at $178.10 billion.

The following monthly report, September 2013, prepared after the Coalition had taken charge, also showed projected year-end debt steady at $178.10 bn. So did the October and November reports.

In December, however, following several decisions by the incoming Treasurer, including abolishing the debt ceiling, the debt projection jumped to $191.52 billion.

This number was reaffirmed in January, February, March and April 2014. In May it was increased to $197.85 billion. Then, without notice, monthly reports ceased.

Clearly, the actual outcome under the Coalition is a cool $24.36 billion more than the debt forecast had Labor stayed on. Up 13.7%.

Advertisement

Hockey has attempted to blame Labor:

"The Final Budget Outcome for the 2013-14 financial year is a budget report card on the previous Government's irresponsible fiscal and economic management."

Hardly. Mr Hockey has had more than 42 weeks – and a clear mandate – to reverse anything "irresponsible". Instead, wasteful spending has increased, including dubious travelfor ministers and their entourages, costly royal visits and expensive royal commissions.

Table 5 of this week's Treasury document shows that in just seven weeks between the May budget and June 30, expenditure on "legislative and executive affairs" blew out by a staggering $68 million. That was not Labor's doing.

Other unjustifiable spending by the Abbott Government includes its exorbitantly priced border protection regime and an $8.8 billion grant paid to the Reserve Bank which it didn't ask for and doesn't need. On the revenue side, equally damaging failures include abolishing the carbon and mining taxes without adequate replacement income. Those were not Labor decisions.

Last week's proof of the debt expansion follows confirmation after the May budget that Abbott and Hockey had more than doubled the projected budget deficits over Labor's levels.

The ABC's fact check unit showedin June that government decisions increased the deficits for the four-year forward estimates period by more than $68 billion.

There seems no urgency now to "balance the books, live within our means and return the budget to surplus as quickly as possible.' Gone are the dire warnings before the last election of debt 'spiralling out of control".

So if the debt was more than $202 billion in June and rising rapidly, what is it now, three months later? Well, we just don't know. The debt reports produced monthly since December 1999 have suddenly stopped.

The Finance Department was asked why this was, and when the next statement would be released. They replied:

"The last Australian Government Monthly Financial Statements were published in May 2014. The June data is incorporated in the Final Budget Outcome document. Under the Charter of Budget Honesty Act 1998 the final date for the release of the Final Budget Outcome is 30 September... The July and August 2014 Australian Government Monthly Financial Statements are prepared and published after the release of the Final Budget Outcome."

How long after? We shall see.

Meanwhile, we now know what the extra debt is costing. A year ago, the Final Budget Outcome for 2012-13 – released by incoming treasurer Hockey – showed net interest payments on the debt were $8.3 billion for that year – the last full year Labor managed the economy. Labor's projected interest bill for 2013-14 was then $8.4 billion, according to Treasury and Finance's Pre-election Economic and Fiscal Outlook.

The actual interest costs incurred for 2013-14, we discovered last week, was a thumping $10.8 billion. That's up 28.6%. (Table 9, page 15.)

So Hockey is not just borrowing more money, but borrowing more expensive money.

Of course, this debt increase is of no immediate economic concern provided the investments are well-managed. There are compelling arguments that Australia's debt has been much too low given negative real interest rates and the opportunity for investments in productive infrastructure.

Australia's debt to gross domestic product is a mere 12.8% even with the recent Hockey blow-out. If that were doubled Australia's debt would still be less than Switzerland's. If tripled it would be less than Canada's. It could be multiplied by six and remain lower than Germany's and the UK's.

All these countries have a triple A credit rating and hence no discernible debt problem. So neither does Australia.

Australia may, however, be experiencing something of a deficit in the fulfilment of pre-election commitments.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Alan Austin is an Australian freelance journalist currently based in Nîmes in the South of France. His special interests are overseas development, Indigenous affairs and the interface between the religious communities and secular government. As a freelance writer, Alan has worked for many media outlets over the years and been published in most Australian newspapers. He worked for eight years with ABC Radio and Television’s religious broadcasts unit and seven years with World Vision. His most recent part-time appointment was with the Uniting Church magazine Crosslight.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Alan Austin

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Alan Austin
Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy