Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Work less, earn less, live a little: tracking the anti-aspirational voter

By Clive Hamilton - posted Wednesday, 22 January 2003


Downshifters do not complain; they quietly go about their lives. There is a clash between their values and those embodied in Australia's political culture. They are disenfranchised because much of the political debate is preoccupied with things in which they have no interest or actively reject.

Unlike middle-class whingers, downshifters do not demand that governments solve their problems for them. They have been offered a 'fistful of dollars' but have said 'no thanks'. And those who have consciously made a downward bracket leap are not worried by bracket creep. They are more likely to ask the Government to ratify the Kyoto Protocol than give them a $30 a week tax break. They remain concerned about affordability; after all, they have reduced their incomes. But they have also proven to themselves that they can do without many of the things they previously took for granted.

The emergence of a large class of downshifters in Australia challenges the old political parties to rethink their most basic suppositions about what makes for a better society. A preoccupation with more growth and higher incomes is no longer enough. Thumbing its nose at the promises of consumerism, downshifting calls for a sea-change in how we define success.

Advertisement

While the rhetoric sometimes changes, the promotion of consumerist values and growth at all costs is unrelenting and these are precisely the social goals that downshifters are rebelling against.

The pre-eminence of economic factors to the exclusion of others is at variance with the life priorities of downshifters, a divergence that no amount of family-friendly rhetoric can conceal. The main political parties remain a long way from redefining the Australian dream in a way that accords with the actions of the growing class of downshifters in the era of abundance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article first appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald on 13 January 2003. An edited version of it appeared in The Age on 11 January.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Clive Hamilton is professor of public ethics at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Clive Hamilton
Related Links
The Australia Institute
Photo of Clive Hamilton
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy