Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The financial planning industry must offer consumers real value for money

By Louise Sylvan - posted Monday, 24 February 2003


Creating a Financial Planning Profession

Finally, it is clear that the industry has failed dismally in its aim to become a profession. With survey results as bad as this, it is unfortunate that the "good guys" in the industry get tarnished with the same brush as the bad. All the ACA can say to the professional and ethical planners is "get your professional association into shape". We probably need a new association - the Independent Financial Planners - who clearly distinguish themselves from the rest by not accepting or rebating commissions.

Further, it is debatable whether the current industry lobby group - the Financial Planning Association (FPA) - should also be the industry professional body. So far, that structure does not seem to have worked to change the industry effectively. The FPA takes virtually no disciplinary action on members and their reluctance to be a proper professional body is now showing publicly. As well, problem denial, which has been the FPA's response to the ACA-ASIC survey, is not a good start. It looks to us like some real leadership is needed - a few heads should be rolling.

While the brunt of the public criticism has been directed at financial planners, the managed funds should not expect to get off scot-free. Who provides the planners with the up-front commissions, the trailing commissions, the trips and outings, the marketing allowances, the Hong Kong 7s? The managed funds of course. Who refuses - in the case of most firms - to rebate the consumer for buying directly rather than through a planner? Who charges inappropriate up-front and exit fees - not only to generate the funds that help pay the commission-based planners - but also to interfere with proper competitive behaviour by consumers in this market? And who gives a certain executive $33 million in payment for supposed performance? The managed funds, of course, whose executives obviously failed to remember the old adage that "genius is a rising market". Perhaps some of these people should now be rewarded for the negative returns their clients are experiencing - by handing some of the performance bonuses back! The corrupt shape of this industry is as much the doing of the managed funds as it is the acquiescent financial planners.

Advertisement

Because of the dismal results of the financial planners in the survey, the ACA has withdrawn its support for superannuation choice. The legal framework, which would allow employees to choose their own superannuation fund, is, in principle, a great idea; the ACA was a stalwart backer of the Government's attempt to introduce choice in the superannuation market. But consumers will need help in selecting this most complex of products. Who will they turn to? Financial planners of course. These planners should not have access to consumers' compulsory retirement savings until major improvements in behaviour are in place as well as stringent consumer protections on fees and commissions.

The message to the financial planning industry is that "time's up" - three strikes and you're out. After the third poor result over eight years in this shadow-shopping by ACA and ASIC, the excuses are no longer acceptable. The industry has been saying for more than 10 years that things are improving; in fact, the industry has gone backwards. If financial planners want consumers to trust them with their hard-earned money, great change is needed in the structure of this industry, and in the attitudes of the planners. In the meantime, for consumers, this is serious "buyer beware" territory. If you decide to see a planner as a consumer, go in armed!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Louise Sylvan is Chief Executive of the Australian Consumers' Association - CHOICE.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Louise Sylvan
Related Links
Australian Consumers' Association
Financial Planning Association of Australia
Photo of Louise Sylvan
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy