Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Senator Day calls out land bankers

By Karl Fitzgerald - posted Monday, 4 August 2014

Finally a Senator has said it, on the front page of the Australian Financial Review:

Senator Day described sections of the property industry as "carpet-bagging, rent-seeking bootleggers" who used political donations to wield ­influence to restrict land supply and drive up prices of high- and medium-density apartments.

He likened the relationship between the property industry and politics as to the economic theory of the "baptists and bootleggers" of the 1920 ­Prohibition, in which both groups favour regulation for opposing reasons.

We commend Senator Day for taking such a strong stand. The former head of the Housing Industry of Australia, who is selling out his stake in the national building empire he formed 40 years ago, went on to say:


"This [his political career] is more important now," Senator Day said.

"When you look at the problems of youth unemployment and housing affordability, to quote Bert Kelly, it's going to take my every waking moment for the next 20 years."

The land banking formula is quite simple.

Cartoon – Tandberg, courtesy of The Age.

This drip feeding was once known as a staged release. Perhaps the real estate for ransom mentality was too close for comfort to 'staged hostage releases'. A new term has thus evolved – sequential development.

The ACCC must investigate this land banking practice. Sequential development can be a recipe for minimal work teams – the slower they build, the more money developers make. How? As population increases and society develops, competition for prime locations is bound to increase. This is a community created economic rent.


In what other industry are holders of crucial natural resources allowed to drip feed these building blocks of life to the market in order to push prices ever higher? It's as if we are permitting water barons to turn our taps on and off unless we pay higher and higher prices.

A Better Way
A fairer system would see these large landholdings broken into smaller allotments to reduce market power. One example allows 17,000 re-zoned sites to just one developer.

Beyond such regulatory control is a taxed based answer. A higher Land Tax will ensure competitive pressure is placed on landholders to put sites on the market as soon as possible. The current cost pressure is something like $5,500 (in council rates and Land Tax) versus capital gains of $30,000 p.a per lot.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Karl Fitzgerald is giving a talk "Collaborative California" about his recent tour of California on Tuesday August 5 at 6:30 (details here). This article was first published on Prosper Australia.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Karl Fitzgerald is the Projects Coordinator for Earthsharing Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Karl Fitzgerald

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy