Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Predicting the 'Super GFC': two very different views

By Syd Hickman - posted Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Two new books give very different pathways to the next financial collapse, one quite conservative and the other radical but both coming from a realist perspective, meaning they extrapolate from facts rather than pinning their faith in simplistic economic theory. Bringing them together provides some additional depth.

The Bankers' New Clothes: What's Wrong with Banking and What to Do about it (Anat Admati and Martin Hellwig)

The two authors are highly respected academics, Admati from the US and Hellwig from Europe. The book has endorsements from former central bank leaders, Paul Volker (US) and Mervyn King (UK), plus the well-known Kenneth S. Rogoff and many more.

The message is fairly straightforward. The GFC was caused by lax regulation of banks. After massively expensive bailouts of banks by governments nothing much has been done to change the controls on banking. In fact things have got worse, so we can expect an even more horrific crash unless governments quickly do some simple things to make the financial system safer. Their final point is that all we need is the political will, but that seems to be lacking.


Their most important prescription is for higher equity to debt ratios for banks, and they demolish all the arguments banks trot out as to why this can't or shouldn't be imposed. The simple point is that with more equity the banks shareholders stand to lose more in a downturn before they go running off to the government for a bailout.

Big changes are also recommended to the contractual bonus incentives that currently encourage bankers to take excessive risk. There are more good ideas in what is at times a fairly dry text.

But along the way some interesting points are made.

The authors point out that banks have incentives to merge, and get bigger in other ways, to achieve the status of 'too big to fail'. Their borrowing becomes cheaper at that point because lenders believe they will be bailed out by governments if it all goes wrong. However, the authors claim banks are going beyond 'too big to fail' and achieving the status of 'too big to save'. With government debts already enormous the bailout costs after another great crunch would be impossibly large.

On March 31, 2012, the debt of JP Morgan Chase was valued at $2.13 trillion and that of Bank of America at $1.95 trillion, more than three times the debt of Leman Brothers [when it collapsed]. The debts of the five largest banks in the United States totalled around $8 trillion. These figures would be even higher under the accounting rules used in Europe. [US GDP is generally believed to be around $15 trillion but see below.]

They go on to say that the situation is even worse in Europe.


The complex interconnection of banks and other financial institutions is outlined as part of the explanation of 'contagion', or how panic can close down the system even when losses are apparently manageable.

Total global banking assets are put at $80 trillion. It is worth remembering that total global domestic product, depending on how it is calculated, ranges between $70 and $85 trillion.

The book includes a quote from Adair Turner, chair of the Financial Services Authority of the UK, made in 2010. '"There is no evidence that the growth of the scale and complexity of the financial system in the rich developed world over the last twenty to thirty years has driven increased growth or stability, and it is possible for financial activity to extract rents from the real economy rather than deliver economic value." He continued, "We need to challenge radically some of the assumptions of the last thirty years and we need to be willing to consider radical policy responses."'

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syd Hickman has worked as a school teacher, soldier, Commonwealth and State public servant, on the staff of a Premier, as chief of Staff to a Federal Minister and leader of the Opposition, and has survived for more than a decade in the small business world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syd Hickman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy