Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Just in from Bizarro World: parents who don't work full-time are disadvantaging their children

By Sonia Bowditch - posted Thursday, 23 January 2014


Because we are now beholden to not only the holy God of Work but also the feminist movement. A woman who does not aspire to full-time work is now ridiculed in feminist circles. Hannah Rosin, author of 'The End of Men and the Rise of Women,' says that she would never not work, 'because that decision is loaded with feminist betrayal.'

A woman, it seems, is no longer allowed to choose to be a housewife, without attracting the ire of the entire sisterhood. So regardless of the consequences for family, for children, a feminist must commit to her career, in the same way as a man.

With this attitude firmly entrenched in the national mindset, though, does this leave a void of caring in the family unit? Certainly it should not be solely a woman's responsibility to shoulder this burden, but surely one parent has to concede a little or the family comes a poor second to work? But, alas, work has now become the greatest defining feature of an individual's worth and children must jolly well fit in.

Advertisement

Just this week, popular commentator and editor of women's website 'Mamamia,' Mia Freeman, opined on Facebook that 'there is something fundamentally flawed about a system that gives parents 4 weeks annual leave and children 12 weeks+ of school holidays' and asks her readers how they are coping. Most reply that they have put their children into vacation care with a heavy and guilty heart. But what would they prefer? That the school year be extended to give children only four weeks' annual leave? Surely children need more time than that to, well, be children. But that doesn't fit in with the working adult's life. Instead, children must become slaves to our hectic timetables, all year long.

At the end of the day, parents must decide whether to alter their own schedules to fit their children's requirements or alter their children's schedule to fit their own. If they choose the latter, they will naturally find that they are unable to assuage their guilt because they know in their hearts that, to a not-insignificant degree, they are robbing their children of a relaxed and slow paced childhood.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Sonia is a Canberra-based freelance writer who likes to pitch her thoughts on society and culture in Australia. She has a Bachelor of Arts from the ANU and a Masters in Writing from Swinburne. Her website is www.bowditchpitch.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Sonia Bowditch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Sonia Bowditch
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy