Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

China’s adaptive authoritarianism is here to stay

By Benjamin Herscovitch - posted Monday, 18 November 2013


Capitalist liberal democracy’s twentieth century victories against expansionist fascism and communism were hard-won and yet also unequivocal.

As Francis Fukuyama argued in 1989: The ‘end of history’ arrived in the wake of the ‘unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism’; politically and economically, there was ‘nothing else towards which we could expect to evolve.’

With the rise of shrewd forms of authoritarianism challenging the liberal mantra of open markets and societies, the presumptive end of history may prove short-lived.

Advertisement

Savvy authoritarian regimes around the world are carefully plotting paths to relative peace and prosperity while trampling on democratic rights and freedoms: One-party state capitalism in China under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP); anti-democratic populism in Russia under the seemingly perpetual presidency of Vladimir Putin; and technocratic and monarchical Islamism in Qatar under the House of Thani.

With the CCP presiding over the most populous nation in history and the world’s second largest economy, the evolution of communist party rule in China is the most revealing and high-stakes test of authoritarian government.

China under the CCP is beset by severe institutional, environmental, political and social challenges.

Between 2008 and 2012 alone, 143,000 government employees were convicted of graft or dereliction of duty, while air pollution caused an estimated 1.2 million premature deaths in 2010. At the same time, 16% of Chinese households have had their land seized or homes demolished during China’s urbanisation drive, and inter-communal violence in the province of Xinjiang killed nearly 200 in 2009 and more than 100 this year.

Although severe, these and other strains on the Chinese political system are unlikely to sweep the CCP from power.

With a strong track record of reform in the post-Mao era, the party has shown that it has the will and wherewithal to mitigate many of the sources of instability and popular discontent, and thereby secure its political survival.

Advertisement

Starting in the 1970s and 1980s, the CCP under Deng Xiaoping supercharged the economy with a measure of economic liberalisation. By de-collectivising agricultural production and launching business-friendly special economic zones, Deng laid the foundations for more than 30 years of uninterrupted economic expansion. This period has seen annual economic growth rates average 10%, and GDP per capita has surged to in excess of US$5,500.

In the 1980s and 1990s, the CCP also decentralised elements of decision-making via the consolidation of village elections. Even if elected local officials never overtly oppose party policy, choosing village leaders charged with responsibility for fiscal management, land allocation and education has given citizens at least a measure of influence over key areas of public policy.

Under the Hu Jintao and now Xi Jinping administrations, the CCP has continued its pragmatic reformism with massive spending to curb China’s atrocious pollution problems, initiatives to better manage the expropriation of rural land, and crackdowns on graft and maladministration.

This year, the CCP launched an Internet-based platform for ‘netizens’ to report cases of official impropriety, and has continued its pursuit of high-profile corruption investigations against senior party members, including former Chongqing party secretary Bo Xilai.

This anti-corruption drive comes as the CCP moves to revise land management laws to minimise exploitation by officials who profiteer by undervaluing farmland purchased from local villagers. Added to this, there are signs that this month’s third plenum of the party’s Central Committee will yield reforms to allow poorer rural Chinese to sell communally owned agricultural land and purchase urban properties.

The CCP also plans to cut coal consumption to below 65% of primary energy use by 2017, and raise the share of non-fossil fuel energy to 13% by 2017, while municipal governments in pollution-prone regions have taken steps to combat air contamination. In Beijing, for example, a smog alert system calls for restrictions on car use and pauses in industrial activity at times when there is a high risk of noxious atmospheric pollution.

Capitalist liberal democracy is still what Fukuyama called ‘the best possible solution to the human problem,’ while the survival of the CCP’s one-party state is far from a fait accompli.

Nevertheless, the success of the CCP’s adaptive authoritarianism suggests history might have been rebooted.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

You can buy a copy of Benjamin Herscovitch's latest book Accountable Authoritarianism: Why China’s Democratic Deficit Will Last by clicking here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Benjamin Herscovitch is a Beijing-based research fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies and previously worked for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Follow him on Twitter @B_Herscovitch.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Benjamin Herscovitch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy