Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Simplifying the Senate

By Syd Hickman - posted Thursday, 3 October 2013


Victoria would have elected three Coalition Senators (2.83 quotas), two ALP (2.26 quotas) and one Green (0.7 quotas). The third Coalition Senator would be replacing the Aust. Motoring Enthusiasts Party candidate elected with 0.035 of a quota plus preferences.

In Queensland three Coalition (2.87 quotas), two ALP (2.0 quotas) and one Palmer United party (0.7 quotas) would have been elected. No change from the election result.

The actual national Senate result, including the four Territory Senators, (though not finally declared) was Coalition 17, ALP 13, Greens 3, Sex party 1, PUP 2, Xenophon 1, Family First 1, Motoring Enthusiasts 1 and Liberal democrats 1.

Advertisement

With my proposed new rules the national totals would have been Coalition 18, ALP 14, Greens 4, Xenophon 2, Palmer United 1, Liberal Democrats 1.

The Sex Party, Motoring Enthusiasts, Family First and one PUP would go. One Liberal (having lost one and won two), one ALP, one Green and a Xenophon nominee would be added. This would more accurately reflect the will of the people, be much quicker to count and eliminate a lot of the nonsense that is now part of upper house ballots in Australia.

In a double dissolution the quota drops to just under 7.7%. While it would still be easier for small parties to win seats, under these new rules they would need at least 3% primary vote to have a real chance. The idiot parties would disappear from the ballot paper, to the great relief of nearly everyone.

The Commonwealth and those States with Upper Houses elected by quotas should be able to make these changes easily as the ALP and Greens would probably support them. They should be enacted to be ready for the next election.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syd Hickman has worked as a school teacher, soldier, Commonwealth and State public servant, on the staff of a Premier, as chief of Staff to a Federal Minister and leader of the Opposition, and has survived for more than a decade in the small business world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syd Hickman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy