Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pursuing national school system improvements

By John Benn - posted Thursday, 26 September 2013


International private sector attendance percentages include Denmark – 10% of students attend independent schools, England – 7%, New Zealand – 4%, USA – 6% and Canada – 6%. Virtually no private schools operate in Finland.

The McKinsey analysis of education performance includes contributory factors that dilute reliance on quantitative measurements embraced by Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (compiled by the OECD) or Trends in International Maths and Science Study (TIMSS) (prepared by an international consortium of research institutes).

PISA-published results placed Australia 27th out of 48 countries in literacy and reading ability for Year 4 students. International TIMSS learning comparisons reveal Australia's Year 8, 2011 maths and science outcomes are weaker than the majority of leading education systems including (in descending achievement order) South Korea, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Japan, Hong Kong, England, USA and Finland.

Advertisement

Jennifer Buckingham, Centre for Independent Studies refutes slavish observance of these international comparisons by noting many sociological, cultural and systems differences exist between PISA excelling 'tiger economy' schools (notably in south-east Asian countries) and learning and teaching in Australia. Fundamental structural differences exist between Australia's and Finland's school systems.

McKinsey adopted an international school systems approach that lists a universal scale score measurement evaluating five performance criteria: Poor, Fair, Good, Great and Excellent in accord with a cross section of scaled national results.

While McKinsey indicated only Finland's education system achieved an 'Excellent' system status six countries and/or education systems – Switzerland, Ontario, Hong Kong, Singapore, Estonia and South Korea – were designated as 'Great' system achievers.

McKinsey also provides international comparisons regarding nation's per capita student spending. USA (the largest per capita spender), Luxemburg, Denmark, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Ontario, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy and Cyprus allocate more per capita towards schooling than Australia.

It is postulated Australia's 'Good' system rating actually represents an amalgam of three separate classifications – 'Poor', 'Fair" and 'Good.' 'Poor' indigenous or disadvantaged schools exist alongside better 'Fair' school outcomes while many 'Good' public and private institutions would be classified as 'Great' school learning environments under the McKinsey criteria.

Australia's 'Good' overall classification documented by McKinsey misconceives the reality that significant system differences exist across Australian schools, between regions and within sectors.

Advertisement

Applying the McKinsey system analysis could more accurately classify all Australian schools and sectors generating different methodologies and response approaches to move Australian education towards a higher overall system achievement.

Determining the conditioners influencing such differentiation is critical if overall system improvement eventuates from Mr Pearson's vision to improve indigenous schooling.

Transitioning system development should become a national education goal where teaching and learning improvement is as much conditioned by changing teaching attitudes and teacher professionalism as it is with structural changes within the system design itself.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

More extensive commentary regarding the McKinsey system analysis is located on www.eduEducators.com.au 'Indigenous learning approach could benefit all schools', 17 September 2013.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Benn has more than 25-year's administrative experience in fund raising, communications and marketing in the non-government school sector. He blogs on education matters affecting schools on www.edueducators.com.au. He holds post graduate degrees in communication from The University of Technology Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Benn

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy