Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

It’s time (to panic)

By Richard Stanton - posted Wednesday, 28 August 2013


Life is filled with unpleasant disruptions. How often do you start out in the morning feeling fine, a spring in your step, a song on your iPod but within five minutes of walking down your street to the train station someone has ruined it. Doesn’t take much to make you mad, right? And there is no way to get over it.

Well you are not alone. Your mood swings wildly from happy to angry within a short space of time precisely because your values and ideals are under constant attack. You know your train will be late, overcrowded and dirty. You know too that you will have to weave and dodge from the train station to your workplace through crowds of people who don’t seem to have any sense of direction. You imagine yourself fainting on the footpath but no help arrives – other people walk over you and around you avoiding looking at you because if they stop to help they will become involved in something that is “not my problem”.

You imagine yourself exactly the same way that others imagine themselves in a society that is experiencing deep rupturing within its institutions — within its schools, its hospitals, its businesses, its corporations, and its local footy clubs.

Advertisement

In what appears to be a world gone mad – your prime minister promises there will be no carbon tax then promptly introduces one — we search vainly for a way to make sense of the madness. We need to rationalise it somehow so that we don’t feel alienated and isolated. Even though we hate them, we turn to the secular news media. We don’t have the time or resources to invest in finding out about all the stuff that is surrounding us, all the big issues that seem to be taking up space in the world — climate change, global warming, gay marriage, an endless list of big ticket issues — so we rely on television, radio and the internet to keep us informed.

We tweet our anger. We sometimes have opinions but because we don’t have time to forensically investigate issues, we rely on journalism and the media to act objectively and to stick to the facts and maintain balance in reporting stuff so that we can make sense of it. But we know they conspire against us.

We expect leadership and our leaders to exercise their authority in the same way we exercise our authority within our family or within our tight circle of friends. We have plenty of friends on Facebook but we don’t always act the same way towards them as we do towards our geographically close friends and family.

We are confused by the big ticket issues like climate change. We have no clue as to why there is so much anger about it on talk back radio, on the golf course, or at the kids playgroup. We have been taking beach holidays since we were kids and the same old waves are still there at the same level in the same old ocean that we have been visiting for yonks. Who is this Flannery guy and why is he trying to persuade us that sea levels will rise and cause devastation some time in the future? Why is he talking up the possibility of the western suburbs of Sydney becoming a heat-infected ghetto some time in the future?

Up until mid 2013 the media and the federal treasurer Wayne Swan kept telling us that we survived the global financial crisis better than any other country and thanks to him and his government ‘working families’ were better off than they had ever been. If this was true, why does the stuff we buy at the supermarket cost twice as much as it did five years ago? Why are petrol prices higher than most other places in the world? Why do we have to wait for hours at public hospital emergency wards before we get treatment?

And the really frightening questions, why is the government allowing China to buy up all our prime agricultural and mining land? Why does it let boat-people arrive and provide them with housing and welfare when we are doing it so tough? Why do the police let ethnic gangs get away with drive-by shootings? Why are Asians and Indians taking all our jobs?

Advertisement

We have arrived at a point in time in Australia that appears to have no historical equal. Political commentators talk about the upheaval of the Whitlam years — a time when there was what might now be called managed chaos within the government and within society — and compare now to then. There is no comparison. We have never been here before. And this is the guts of the problem.

The social and political institutions that exist are incapable of managing the monumental changes that are being driven through Australian society. Governments, schools, universities, businesses, corporations, hospitals, and the police are leaderless. Those in control — politicians, chief executives, principals, doctors — are terrified of being sued if they say anything. They have succumbed to a culture of endless argument. Parliament, board rooms, university lecture theatres and school class rooms are now suffering the paralysing constraints of endless argument.

But the arguments are not enlightening. There is no rationalisation. The arguments are polar in the extreme. The ‘progressives’ as they have become known, the left of centre green-type individual is intolerant of all other views. In their quest for ‘change that they believe in’ they have abandoned objectivity and sadly, all sense of irony or humour. The conservatives — a label that like progressive is inaccurate — the right of centre red-neck individual believes that if something ain’t broke it don’t need fixing.

Both sides of the argument are correct but again sadly they are proving Samuel Huntington’s late 20th century image of a clash of civilisations. Unlike Huntington’s clash which involved global region against global region with its basis in religious differences, the clash within Australian society has its basis in monumentally silly private and public policy decisions. And like an accelerant, divisive federal government rhetoric aimed at creating class warfare is inflaming an already scorching situation. We are in meltdown.

We have not arrived at this chaotic point in social history by accident. But we are here and we need to work out swiftly how to extract ourselves before the words of Irish poet W B Yeats that ‘the centre cannot hold” become a reality. If we are to avoid complete chaos and a descent into anarchy, to become the ‘basket case’ of the Pacific as Greece is to Europe, we need to know some stuff.

We no longer trust leaders. We are not investing in public companies. We are cynical to the point of believing everyone is trying to sell us something we don’t want. We no longer have faith in our established institutions — churches, governments, charities, the news media. We do not trust the news media (we still trust the medium of money, but only just and that’s another kettle of sharks). We are unable to find meaning in wider society. We don’t get the fabricated image of ‘community’ that politicians try to persuade us exists. We think we are being worked over by corporations and their advertisers. We think we are paying more for goods and services than is fair. We don’t get the arguments that tell us we should take sides on the big issues such as climate change and boat-people.

We are a society that is being influenced by forces beyond our control. We expect our politicians to make promises that they might keep if we elect them to public office. We have three levels of government — more than most other countries — and we now know that they rarely, if ever, say what they mean and mean what they say. The immediate past prime minister said we would not have a carbon tax. And we have one. Big mining companies say they will invest in new mining ventures that will create new jobs. Then they don’t. State governments promise to build new infrastructure such as ports and roads. In office they discover there is no funding and that they have no knowledge of how to go about the process if they did have funding. Local governments promise to fix roads. Nothing changes. Police promise to keep society safe. Drug gangs shoot the crap out of each other.

What is going to happen to us if we keep driving down this unsign-posted track?

Can Australia meet the challenges that have been set down by public and private interests since the death of the Howard government five years ago? Are national elections now simply dramatised spectacles that present a stage for actors who seek consent by making public promises they have no intention of keeping?

Are corporations engaging in shifty practices — are they working in our real interests rather than their own profit interests? Are charities doing good work or are they succumbing to the shifty practices of the corporate sector — who regulates charities? Are religious institutions attempting to influence public policy? Are the media tricking us — do they have hidden agendas?

Are we being subjected to mass persuasion by public and private interests? Are we being persuaded to believe in and to do things we feel deep-down are not reflective of our best interests? Does the weight of our very existence within the social structure preclude us from even having the time or patience to think about anyone other than ourselves? Is our own well-being more important than anyone else’s? Are we capable of and do we have the capacity to survive the present meltdown?

The old who, what, where, when, why, and how, questions are a good place to start. If we can grasp who, what, where, when why and how we got to this point, then we can work on a strategy to get out of it. When you find yourself in a hole the first thing to do is stop digging.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This is an edited extract from Scorched Earth, which can be bought from Verandah Press for $12.99.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Stanton is a political communication writer and media critic. His most recent book is Do What They Like: The Media In The Australian Election Campaign 2010.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Stanton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy