Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hayek and Popper: smothered giants of the Twentieth Century

By Rafe Champion - posted Tuesday, 23 July 2013


Possibly the most important is the "conjectural turn" to acknowledge that even our most respected and apparently well-supported theories (like Newtonian mechanics) may be found wanting in the light of  new developments. 

The second is to focus on objective, public or inter-subjective knowledge rather than the subjective beliefs which are the standard “stock in trade” of academic epistemology.

The third is the social turn to acknowledge the function of "rules of the game" of science; these are the methodological conventions like replication, repeatability, criteria for  statistical testing, and the protocols for reporting and publication, including peer review.  The social turn draws attention to influential aspects of the institutional context, such as the source of funding,  and it can be found in Popper's work well before Kuhn and the sociology of knowledge appeared.  He did not pursue that line in depth because his interests were elsewhere, but the signal that he gave was clear enough, especially near the end of The Poverty of Historicism and in Chapter 23 of The Open Society and its Enemies.

Advertisement

The fourth is to abandon extended conceptual analysis and the definition of terms, which he called essentialism.  Instead the focus should be on theories and practical policies, on the problems that need to be solved and the comparative merits of the rival contenders that claim to solve them.

The fifth is the evolutionary or biological turn.

The sixth is the revival of  metaphysics in the heart of the philosophy of science with a theory of “metaphysical research programs” which Lakatos borrowed and re-branded as a theory of scientific research programs.

None of those turns are unique to Popper but the combination is very powerful and his career can be described as the application of those turns to a wide range of problems in philosophy, physics  and the social sciences.

The Poverty of Historicism and The Open Society and its Enemies.

Popper wrote these books in New Zealand while the outcome of the war was in doubt and 16 of his relatives perished in the Holocaust.  The Poverty of Historicism was published as a series of articles during 1944/45 and in book form in 1957. The final sections of this work describe  "Situational Analysis" which Popper proposed as a general methodology for the social sciences.

Advertisement

The Open Society and its Enemies, almost 800 pages, including 300 pages of notes in small print, should have been condensed by Readers Digest (like Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom).  It was  a major diversion from Popper’s primary interests which he took on as his contribution to the war effort.

 Conjectures and Refutations

The  1963  collection of papers in Conjectures and Refutations demonstrated the full range of Popper's interests more effectively than The Poverty and The Logic of Scientific Discovery.  However  by this time his stocks were falling under the influence of Kuhn and other critics such as Feyerabend and Lakatos . They energetically promulgated the Standard Errors of interpretation of Popper's ideas and so generations of students were  misled and some of these  student became authors and wrote misleading books.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rafe Champion brings the grafting qualities of the opening batsman and the cunning of the offspin bowler to the task of routing dogmatists, protectionists and other riff-raff who stand in the way of peace, freedom and plenty. He has a website and he blogs at Catallaxy and also at The History of Australian and New Zealand Thought. For more about Rafe visit here. All of his posts on Catallaxy for 2007 can be found at this link. Not all the links work and some need to be cut and pasted into the browser.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rafe Champion

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy