Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The cipher of the sniffer

By Eleanor Hogan - posted Friday, 26 August 2005


But to return to the cipher of the sniffer, and to the question of why petrol sniffing should periodically attract such national curiosity and sensationalist media attention. I’m wondering whether it might be because the sniffer represents so much angst about the state of play in Indigenous communities - so much despair, so much damage and havoc, so much futility, so much lost youth, and so much angst about the linkages between government policy and communities, and the future directions for indigenous policy.

I'm also left wondering why it's been so difficult for people to pull out their respective thumbs on this issue, given that in some ways it's a containable problem. In 2000 the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination committee made similar queries about why Australia as a nation was failing to address its indigenous people's problems. The committee's rapporteur observed:

… it's of serious concern the extent of the dramatic inequalities that are still being experienced by these population groups when they represent only, you know, no more than 2 per cent of the population of a highly developed, industrialised state, and … it makes me wonder about things like the effectiveness of the programs, monitoring, benchmarking, what are the standards, is anybody watching this to see whether or not they really are designed to meet the disadvantages that are real in the communities, you know the real history of systemic discrimination, institutional racism?

Advertisement

After ten years of the Howard government’s practical reconciliation agenda aimed at “breaking the shackles” in Indigenous communities, we might well ask what exactly has been achieved. Are policymakers merely killing Indigenous communities softly in a new lather of language - such as “whole-of-government”, “whole-of-community approaches”, “community engagement”, “governance”, “capacity-building” to name a few - without achieving many of those so-called “outcomes”? And is tinkering with social security payments really going to alleviate serious issues such as petrol sniffing now spanning two and three generations in some remote communities, as suggested in a recent Australian editorial. Or are more far-reaching, transformative approaches needed?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

31 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Eleanor Hogan is a freelance writer living in Alice Springs with a background in Indigenous policy and research.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Eleanor Hogan
Photo of Eleanor Hogan
Article Tools
Comment 31 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy