Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Prevention of the next potentially disastrous flood

By Lloyd Hamilton - posted Monday, 11 February 2013


After having to rebuild infrastructure again, and again, after big floods the Queensland State Government is now considering preventative measures.

Premier Campbell Newman has pledged to flood-proof parts of disaster-prone Queensland, by shifting suburbs to higher ground, raising highways, and building new levee banks.

Before taking this action further careful planning should be taken. While all these ideas have merit there are others that also should be seriously considered.

Advertisement

Furthermore, building new levee banks is not a good solution for many areas. It is disastrous when levee banks are broken or over-topped. The height has to be just right and who knows how high the next flood will be. Floods of 1893, 1841 and perhaps 1824 were higher than that in 2011. Furthermore, with global warming we can expect even bigger and more frequent floods than those.

Levee banks are probably unsuitable for the Brisbane River flood plain although they may possibly be useful in the Toowoomba region where conditions are different. Levee banks have failed in areas like New Orleans in USA, Northern Japan where they failed to stop the 2011 tsunami, and in China where hundreds of thousands of people have lost their lives when levee banks failed in the past.

More attention should have been made to flood-proofing after the 2011 floods. Instead much of the attention went on management and legalistic blame-finding in the control of Wivenhoe Dam. 753 submissions were made to the Flood Commission about what to do and very few of these have been followed up. There were several suggestions of merit that were totally overlooked. The least the Commission could do was to check out the merit of these concerning issues such as relief to Wivenhoe Dam (other than water level control), relief to the Brisbane River below the dam, and relief to the rainfall situation.

Relief to Wivenhoe dam can be effected by diversion of water below Somerset Dam to North Pine River. Another way is to divert water from Billies Crossing to North Pine River. Both of these involve tunnels. Further relief could be gained by extending Atkinson Dam to take overflow from Wivenhoe via a channel.

Diversion of water from below Somerset Dam to North Pine River

Reedy Ceek is just below Somerset Dam and extends east into Byron Creek. The D'Aguilar Range separates Reedy Creek from North Pine River. It is proposed to join Reedy Creek to North Pine River with a tunnel through the range terminating at a point near where Laceys Creek joins North Pine River. This gives a fall of about 10m over a distance of about 19 km which is enough slope for the water to run down. To get a greater head of water the tunnel could go about 3km further to a point below Lake Somerset dam. This greater head of water could allow for a shorter tunnel.

Advertisement

The positive aspect of this is that a considerable amount of water can be diverted from entering Wivenhoe Dam.

Negative aspects are that the tunnel is long and therefore costly, and that the water will be diverted into Lake Samsonvale and North Pine Dam. The North Pine waterway out through Petrie will need to be able to take a larger flow, and may need some modification.

Diversion of water from the Billies Crossing area to North Pine River

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lloyd Hamilton is a retired associate professor in geology from QUT.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy