Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Freight myopia in Sydney's strategic economic future

By Robert Gibbons - posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013


Sydney Ports Corporation, Logistics Review 2010/11

Governments cannot direct boxes onto rail or road and indeed they do not know consignee details. The point is, regardless, as the iNSW inquiry said, "most attention has focused on lifting rail share by boosting rail supply capacity, without a similar level of focus on demand generators. This can be traced back to at least the … Freight Infrastructure Advisory Board, which recommended that the then 40 per cent rail share target be met through additional intermodal terminal capacity, without adequately assessing the factors that drove freight users to travel by road". (The rail share is down to 14 per cent, less than half of rail's capacity.)

iNSW was not aware of a Shipping Australia report, "Metropolitan Intermodal Terminal Study (SAL, 2011). It contained many relevant observations but notably summarised the costs involved in moving a 20' container from the Port to its end point on the first leg. Rail is already competitive by SAL's numbers and relative changes will occur as land-side and road/rail systems improve:

Advertisement

PATTERN

 

Time (hours)

Container Rate ($)

20’ box direct, by road, then to container park

 

4.58

458

20’ box by road to depot, then to container park

 

4.91

634

20’ box by rail to IMT thence road to customer and later to park

-

476

Empty containers are held at container park for separate on-transport to port or to be filled elsewhere

With this in mind, we can re-interpret iNSW's own words (they deferred all strategic rail freight improvements to future dates) –

… it is argued rail has the potential to compete with road freight. Analysis … suggests that rail could be cost competitive or cheaper than road freight for these movements providing the following circumstances were met:

• volumes to increase substantially to gain economies of scale

• portside handling movements to be reduced through terminal reconfiguration

Advertisement

• investment in intermodal terminal capacity, enabling rail to road transfer (and vice versa)

• investment in warehousing and empty container facilities close to these intermodal terminals.

Not one regional body has risen to the challenge, all being deliberative and consultative in a context where available State funds are hypothecated to northern Sydney long-term passenger projects of marginal benefit. An example is RDA/Sydney which is charged with Commonwealth/State planning of Sydney and which issued Strategic Plans in 2011 and 2012. It pushes an outer circumferential rail line that would service Badgerys Creek employment lands; but no agency has done an assessment of that against the alternative E-W options raised by Ron Christie and the Government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Robert Gibbons started urban studies at Sydney University in 1971 and has done major studies of Sydney, Chicago, world cities' performance indicators, regional infrastructure financing, and urban history. He has published major pieces on the failure of trams in Sydney, on the "improvement generation" in Sydney, and has two books in readiness for publication, Thank God for the Plague, Sydney 1900 to 1912 and Sydney's Stumbles. He has been Exec Director Planning in NSW DOT, General Manager of Newcastle City, director of AIUS NSW and advisor to several premiers and senior ministers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Robert Gibbons

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Robert Gibbons
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy