Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The best and worst of the U.S. and how Australia compares - Part 2

By Andrew Leigh and Justin Wolfers - posted Monday, 19 January 2004


In an attempt to measure how well young Americans understand the world around them, the Roper polling organisation last year asked 18-24 year olds in nine countries (not including Australia) a number of questions about geography. They found that:

  • In their geography skills, Americans ranked second-last. The only country trailing the U.S. was its considerably poorer neighbour, Mexico.
  • Only 36 percent of young Americans speak a second language – well below the rates in mainland Europe
  • 11 percent could not find the U.S. on a world map. In no other country were so many young people unable to find their own country. In fact, only half as many French youngsters failed to find the U.S. on a world map.
  • Nearly three times as many young Americans knew the region where the last season of the television show “Survivor” was filmed (34 per cent) than could locate either Iraq (13per cent) or Afghanistan (12 per cent).

Much of this ignorance flows from media reporting. As anyone who’s ever visited the U.S. and tried to get some news from home can attest, the American media is firmly focused on America. In an article analysing the media coverage of last year’s Bali bombing, we estimated that a tragedy that takes place outside America is likely to receive somewhere between one-tenth and one-hundredth of the coverage that it would if it happened inside the U.S.

Advertisement

And of course, no discussion of ignorance about the world is complete without a mention of George W. Bush, the President who had only left the U.S. on three occasions before taking office. While on the campaign trail, Bush was left stumbling when asked in an interview to name the leaders of Chechnya, Taiwan, India and Pakistan. In another incident, comic Rick Mercer, posing as a journalist, informed Bush that Canadian Prime Minister, “Jean Poutine”, had just endorsed his candidacy for the presidency (poutine is a Quebec dish of potato chips, gravy and cheese curds). Bush said that he was honoured to receive the support.

Of course, Australians shouldn’t laugh too hard. How many of us could name the last three Prime Ministers of New Zealand?

Obesity

America has the highest fraction of fat people of any country in the world – as you might guess if you contemplated the great Southern dish of double fried steak, looked at the size of the seats in the average American car, or spoke with the “International Size Acceptance Association” (slogan: It’s a BIG world, after all!). The obesity problem has become so serious that Americans airlines have developed policies on whether big people should be required to buy two seats; the home stadium of the San Francisco Giants advertises larger seats; and several unhappy burger eaters are suing a fast food giant for not warning them that excess consumption could cause obesity.

But before Australians offer a thin smile to the country that author Eric Schlosser has dubbed “Fast Food Nation”, we should take a moment to reflect on the size of our collective waistlines. There are nearly as many McDonald’s restaurants per capita in Australia as in the U.S. Nearly a fifth of Australians are obese, and across the OECD, only Britain, Germany and the U.S. are weightier countries.

We end on this fat note, not because it is the most important of our ten “best and worst” features, but rather most illustrative of our broader thesis. The McDonald’s-ization of America is an unmistakably ugly part of the country. We often look across the Pacific with disdain for the country that regards the Triple Cheeseburger as a natural culinary evolution. Yet America is a country of many amazing achievements, and not just waistlines. This is the country that won the space race, catalysed the technology boom, and through the Cold War reshaped the world’s economic and political structures. While inequality strains the cohesion of America’s citizenry, she can still boast a powerful set of national values, whose persistent optimism yields thriving philanthropy and education sectors – and where a commitment to equal opportunity still burns bright.

Still, when feasting from the U.S. smorgasbord, it would behove us to be a little pickier. As we look at America’s least attractive features, we see a list from which we have amply sampled. Our waistlines are expanding. Our voters are becoming disengaged from the major parties. Inequality is rising, and healthcare funding is being skewed to the rich. And as our engagement with America has risen, our engagement with our Asian neighbours is withering.

Advertisement

This is not to suggest that the way forward is to set ourselves apart from America, as our friends across the Tasman have done. Greater engagement with the U.S. will help unleash Australia’s dormant innovation. The education imperative will only be enhanced by learning from those who lead the world in so many technological domains. And we hope that careful study will lead our politicians to better understand the best features of the U.S. labour market, while putting her worst features to the side.

Our advice is simple: trade between the nations is a good thing, but we should import only the best from the U.S. Alas, over the past decade, we have systematically embraced the worst. At its heart, perhaps the challenge is one of national values. American values are no substitute for a home-grown sense of identity. But America does provide the evidence that forging our own national ideals will fundamentally affect everything that we do.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Doug Geyser for outstanding research assistance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This is part two of an article first published in AQ. Part one discusses some of the advantages of life in the States.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Andrew Leigh is the member for Fraser (ACT). Prior to his election in 2010, he was a professor in the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University, and has previously worked as associate to Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia, a lawyer for Clifford Chance (London), and a researcher for the Progressive Policy Institute (Washington DC). He holds a PhD from Harvard University and has published three books and over 50 journal articles. His books include Disconnected (2010), Battlers and Billionaires (2013) and The Economics of Just About Everything (2014).

Dr Justin Wolfers is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Business and Public Policy Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Andrew Leigh
All articles by Justin Wolfers
Related Links
Andrew Leigh's home page
Justin Wolfers's home page
Photo of Andrew LeighAndrew LeighPhoto of Justin WolfersJustin Wolfers
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy