Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

No amount of belief can create a fact

By Andre Zonn - posted Wednesday, 14 November 2012

Australians all let us rejoice, the weekend now is near, we've worked all bloody week for this, dear god let's go and get a beer… Sound familiar?

It's part of a new national anthem written by my mate Aussie Dave. He reckons it's a better reflection of life in the lucky country. The lucky country? You know, the place where colonists carved out a new society in the bush across Terra Nullius, where Aussies were equal and entitled to a 'fair go'. Times haven't changed much for Dave. Maybe he's right. Dave's white, got a wife, job, house, a car, education, seems healthy and critically, can afford a beer. Aren't we all like Dave? Isn't Australia a land of opportunity? If not, maybe with some hard yakka, we'll get there too.

Sadly, preoccupation with egalitarianism in Australian society seduces us from looking at underlying processes and structures that make assertions about egalitarianism in Australia difficult to sustain.


Them's fightin' words I hear you say. So what is the issue? Health! Whose? Yours, mine, everyone's.

If Australians are equal, why do some of our 'mates' have poorer health and reduced quality of life? If a 'mate' is likely to die younger or suffer more illness because of where he lives, his colour, his job or how much his parents earn, are things really equal? Would you like a share in that kind of equality? I think not!

Naaaaah, garbage you say! Australia consistently ranks in the top ten OECD nations on life expectancy and mortality rates due to high living standards, our world class health care system and Medicare. I say in response, don't confuse the issue with facts.

The Senate is reviewing Australia's domestic response to a report: Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health (WHO, 2008). The report shows that substantial, systematic health inequality can't be attributed solely to individual physiology or behaviour and says that health inequality is both systematic and avoidable. The ACOSS Poverty Report (2011) reported "approximately 2.2 million people, 11% of Australians lived in poverty in 2006 compared with 10% in 2004 and 8% in 1994 ". Poverty means good health isn't shared by all Australians and it's getting worse mate!

Aaaaarrrrggghhh! Who gives a stuff? I'm OK.

Not necessarily. You pay for it. What?


Health inequity costs in two ways. First you have to be healthy to work, cook a barbie after the footy and be smart enough to read a paper to work out who to vote for every three years. If you can't do that because you're sick, or excluded through disadvantage, productivity drops and your slice of the 'Aussie pie of life' shrinks. Secondly, and this is the killer, health inequities are a direct economic cost to us all. That's you and me mate! We pay for it through our taxes. As inequity grows, so does the burden, in billions of dollars, on our health system.

Orright right then, I'm getting sick just thinking about how much tax I pay. How can we fix this whole schemozzle?

Well, Catholic Health (2012) found that if Australia adopted the WHO model of 'health in all policies' then "500,000 Australians could avoid chronic illness; 170,000 extra Australians could enter the workforce, generating $8 billion in extra earnings; saving $4 billion in welfare support payments annually; 60,000 fewer people would be admitted to hospital annually, saving $2.3 billion in hospital expenditure with 5.5 million fewer Medicare services, saving $273 million annually".

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andre Zonn is currently completing a Masters In Social Work at Melbourne University.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Andre Zonn
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy