Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Unfair trials

By Evan Whitton - posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012


5. Pattern evidence concealed. Judge Fox says an understanding of facts depends heavily on context. Patterns of criminal behaviour have been concealed since 1894.

The rule obliges prosecutors to deceive jurors: repeat offenders, e.g. white and blue collar organised criminals and serial rapists, are presented as first offenders.

6. Contaminated evidence concealed. Evidence which was improperly gained is totally barred in the US. The Australian rule is that such evidence goes in only if it is reliable and if the alleged crime is worse than the investigators' misbehaviour.

Advertisement

Note. Judges accept evidence contaminated by lawyers' sophistry.

7. Any or all evidence concealed. In 1914, in what is called the Christie discretion, English judges gave judges the power to conceal any or all evidence if it might prejudice the jury against the accused.

A detective said: "As far as I can see, prejudicial means evidence that proves he did it." In some cases, jurors would be stupefied if reporters were to reveal evidence thus concealed after the verdict.

8. The jury formula. About 25% of guilty defendants get off because jurors do not know what "beyond what reasonable doubt" means, and judges are not allowed to tell them it simply means: Are you thoroughly convinced?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Our Corrupt Legal System: Why Everyone Is a Victim (Except Rich Criminals) is Evan Whitton’s fourth book on the law. The others can be sighted at and downloaded from netk.net.au/whittonhome.asp.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Evan Whitton is a former reporter who became a legal historian after seeing how two systems dealt with the same criminal, Queensland police chief Sir (as he then was) Terry Lewis.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Evan Whitton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy