Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What is missing in Australia's skills training market

By Richard Curtain - posted Thursday, 6 September 2012


The Foundation's report Britain's Got Talent: Unlocking the demand for skillsargues that government's investment in human capital would be far more effective if training providers were 'liable for the labour market value of the skills delivered'. They contend that providers are well placed to do this because they are embedded in local economies. So it is easy for training providers to approach employers, identify their skill needs and to work out how to supply the skills they need. They can then use this information to encourage candidates to take the courses linked to local employer demand for skills. Their incentive is that at least some of their funding will be dependent on showing that the training has led to improved employment outcomes.

A government's investment in skills training can be more easily justified to the public if its link to lifting productivity can be shown in the form of existing employees's higher wages and job seekers' employment rates. This focus on outcomes will also make training providers more accountable for how well they can deliver the skills that employers value.

Training providers will have to take on some of the financial risk for delivering good labour market outcomes. This proposed arrangement is similar to the system of payment by results used by the Australian Government to allocate funding for placing job seekers in work.

Advertisement

The cost to government of providing good information on employment outcomes at TAFE Institute level and the incentive to do will be a small proportion of the savings to state budgets from training blow-outs.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Curtain is a public policy consultant with a strong interest in skills formation policy. He is a member of an expert panel for Higher Education and Skills Group, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Government of Victoria. He has also recently prepared a response to Australia’s Skills and Workforce Future Focus Discussion Paperof the Australian Workforce and Productivity Agency for the Recruitment and Consulting Services Association of Australia and New Zealand.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Curtain

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Richard Curtain
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy