Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The slippery slope to homophobia

By Rodney Croome - posted Thursday, 7 June 2012


If there is a slippery slope to multiple-partner and incestuous relationships then, to be facetious again, it is the heterosexuals we have to blame.

Almost all polygamous and polyamorous relationships are, or begin as, heterosexual couplings.

The point is underlined by Australia’s highest profile example of a polygamous relationship – a Perth man who wants to keep his wife and marry her twin as well.

Advertisement

This unusual arrangement flows “logically” out of a heterosexual marriage not a gay one.

What we are seeing here is just the kind of fear campaign that has always accompanied the removal of discrimination against gay Australians. 

Opponents of decriminalising homosexuality, anti-discrimination laws and gay parenting loudly predicted society would collapse.

They were wrong then and they’re wrong now.

But still, opponents of same-sex marriage are going all out to beat up fears about the slippery slope. 

In recent weeks we’ve seen them evolve from simply declaring same-sex marriage will lead to polygamy and polyamory, to trying to wedge the Greens and same-sex marriage advocates on the issue.

Advertisement

If we agree that “equality” means equality for all relationships, we’re damned for allowing polygamy and polyamory.  If we disavow polygamy and polyamory, we’re damned for not sticking to our principle of “equality”.

As far as wedges go this one is pretty weak.

It shows a profound misunderstanding of what marriage is and contempt for the common sense of the majority of ordinary Australians who support same-sex marriage but not multiple-partner relationships.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy