Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Everyone knows' obesity kills, but is weight loss the answer?

By Lydia Turner - posted Thursday, 3 May 2012


Yesterday an opinion piece by author Kasey Edwards emerged as a leading story on The Sydney Morning Herald's website. Edwards criticized weight loss company Jenny Craig (now rebranded as Jenny) for using celebrity Barry Humphries/Dame Edna as its latest ambassador.

Acknowledging that fifty years of research demonstrates weight loss maintenance carries a 95% failure rate, Edwards concluded: "given such 'evidence', it's no surprise diet companies resort to a stream of celebrity ambassadors to sell the fantasy that their tailored eating and exercise plans are a path to permanent weight loss and happiness."

It's refreshing to see articles questioning the traditional weight loss message in mainstream news. For many years we have been bombarded relentlessly with one-sided articles about how obesity makes one a 'ticking time bomb,' that Australia is the world's fattest nation (which is not true), that we need to lose weight now or die!

Advertisement

It seems a confusing time for Australians who want to improve their health. Most are not yet aware that in recent years there has been a quiet war being waged amongst health professionals about how to approach health.

In one corner, the traditional weight-centred paradigm tells us obesity is harmful, that the only solution to avoid these harms is by losing weight, and more often than not, that we only have ourselves to blame if we don't maintain the weight lost.

There are of course variations on this narrative, but they more or less follow this script.

In the other corner are various versions of non weight-based approaches to health, with a dominant health-centred paradigm emerging. This paradigm is still in its infancy and trademarked to prevent the weight loss industry from hijacking its approach to health and distorting its key principles to support the ultimate goal of weight loss.

Known as Health At Every Size®*, the HAESSM paradigm is often mistaken to mean an individual can be healthy at any size. In fact HAES is about engaging in healthy behaviours, whatever one's size, and letting one's weight fall where it will as a result of these health-giving behaviours.

HAES acknowledges that only one of three things will happen to a person's weight when they engage in a process of health: it will go up, go down, or remain the same. Regardless of weight, a person's health will improve simply by engaging in healthy behaviours.

Advertisement

HAES critically examines peer-reviewed research and challenges current day understandings about health and weight. It accepts that biological safeguards make weight loss ineffective for the majority over time, and that weight loss attempts put people at risk of unintended consequences, including food and body preoccupation, cycles of weight regain and loss, reduced self esteem, weight stigma and discrimination, binge eating, and higher than pre-diet starting weight.

While "everyone knows" obesity is harmful, a close examination of obesity research shows many of the claims about obesity have been exaggerated. Pop health 'experts' who claim that people should strive to be the 5% who manage to keep some weight off in the long term, and that people should 'try, try again' reveal ignorance about the harms of weight cycling and risks of weight loss dieting.

The HAES paradigm acknowledges that research shows health risks can be mitigated by engaging in healthy behaviours and letting your weight fall where it will.

Being brought up in a fatphobic culture where what we learn about health and weight stems from the weight-centred paradigm, it can sometimes be a challenge to actually hear what those in the health-centred camp are advocating. Messages get distorted in a way that makes sense within a weight-dominant schema.

Which perhaps explains why journalist Maria Moscaritolo took it upon herself to write an article titled "Fat acceptance might help your ego, but it could kill you" in The Punch on Saturday . Her article was in response to one I had written earlier in the week, and it completely misrepresented my views on health and weight.

As one reader put aptly:

Maria, you quoted Lydia Jade Turner's advice that "The best thing we can do for our health is focus on health-giving behaviours, and allow our weight to fall where it will." But then, as Jamie noted, you basically amputated the first half of the sentence and criticised the second half out of context. …Turner does not advise 'giving up on your weight'; she advises shifting the focus to health-giving behaviours, and accepting the weight that results from those health-giving behaviours.

Somewhere along the line, the idea that accepting one's body and engaging in healthy behaviours regardless of size, had been lost.

Unfortunately many pop health 'experts' distort research to fuel their weight loss claims. I have debunked a number of claims in media before – including ones by Biggest Loser trainer Michelle Bridges. I do this because their messaging is both misguided and harmful.

Ultimately I respect a person's choice to embark on a weight loss diet. But I firmly believe it is also their right to understand the inherent risks that accompany weight loss attempts and the significant failure rate over time.

Moscaritolo argued in favour of the traditional weight loss paradigm, stating "Why else is the medical profession tearing its hair out over our obesity "epidemic"?

While I'm tempted to cite significant financial conflicts of interest given 95% of obesity research is funded by the multi-billion dollar weight loss industry, it's also the case that science has always been influenced by the zeitgeist of its time.

Throughout history there have been numerous paradigm shifts. What we are experiencing currently is akin to those who push weight loss believing that the earth is flat. The research simply does not support the idea that obesity is automatically harmful (except at statistical extremes).

While many think they demand to see scientific evidence to support their existing view that fat kills, most don't have time nor the means to access peer reviewed journals to assess the validity of what is being reported. This is not their fault. We learn to trust those recognised as health authorities – even if what they are reporting is not necessarily objective or accurate.

As International No Diet Day approaches this Sunday May 6, a non-profit activist group Endangered Bodies Australia is launching a 'Dance Walk' in Sydney. The best way to describe a 'dance walk' can be seen in this video clip.

Dance walking perhaps best encapsulates the spirit of the HAES approach, honouring one of its key principles: to promote individually appropriate, enjoyable, life-enhancing physical activity, rather than exercise that is focused on a goal of weight loss.

You might care to join.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lydia Jade Turner is the Managing Director of BodyMatters Australasia (www.bodymatters.com.au) and co-founder of Endangered Bodies Australia, a non-profit grassroots activist movement dedicated to challenging visual culture and the harmful multi-billion dollar diet industry. As a public health advocate and psychotherapist specialising in eating disorders prevention, she has featured in a range of media including The Sun Herald, The Australian, The Daily Telegraph, National Nine News, The Morning Show, 2UE and ABC Radio.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Lydia Turner

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Lydia Turner
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy