Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Terrible consequences of ladder of escalation

By Julie Bishop - posted Thursday, 26 April 2012


The World Wars and particularly the destruction unleashed between 1939 and 1945 shocked the world into action which resulted in the formation of the United Nations and greater economic and cultural integration in Europe.

The Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States rested on the MAD principle of mutually assured destruction, where neither side would be able to defeat the other due to large arsenals of nuclear weapons.

When the Iron Curtain came down between 1989 and 1991, there was great hope that long-lasting global peace could be a reality.

Advertisement

The former Soviet Union dissolved into its former independent nations and Russia embraced a more democratic system of government and a market economy.

The other great communist state of China has also become integrated into the world economy.

China has too much to lose from any outbreak of hostilities with its neighbours or with the United States and its allies.

While other wars and hostilities have occurred at different times and in different places around the world, there has been nothing approaching the scale of the two terrible wars of the last century.

After the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, the world should need no reminder of the horrible consequences of nuclear weapons.

However, it is the isolation - self-imposed and through international sanctions - of North Korea that increases global concerns about the fragility of peace.

Advertisement

Hostilities in the Korean War ended in 1953 with an armistice. Technically North and South Korea remain at war.

During a visit to South Korea, it was obvious from my discussion with government officials that North Korea's military and nuclear ambitions are never far from their minds.

While we hope that North Korea is unlikely to ever have the capacity to threaten global conflict on the scale that erupted during the two great World Wars, it does have the capacity to threaten global stability through its nuclear weapons development.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julie Bishop is the Federal Member for Curtin, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julie Bishop

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julie Bishop
Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy