Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Democratic dysfunction in thumping Queensland result

By Crispin Hull - posted Monday, 2 April 2012


It is a bit like having slightly faulty TV reception – some pixilation, an annoying red line or some snow. Some people will put up with it out of apathy or fear that trying to do something might cause a total failure of reception – catastrophe. Others will go out a fiddle with the aerial or thumb through the ever-increasingly complex menu of reception and picture-quality options on the remote in the pursuit of a better picture.

I’m and aerial and remote-control fiddler.

As at 2012, Queensland may well be better governed under the LNP than Labor, but I think that Queensland would be better governed by the LNP with a majority of 10 to 20 than by the LNP with a majority of 60 or 70.

Advertisement

Another way to deal with the swamp effect is to have multi-member electorates as in the ACT and Tasmania. That works for places small in area and population. If we had had single-member electorates in the ACT we would have had a swamp effect at nearly every election since self-government, with Labor or Liberal winning all 17 seats on some occasions.

It would have been terrible for democracy. The reason we did not have a single-member system is because the Coalition in the Senate prevented the then Labor Government having its way.

The gasps of incredulity at the Queensland result have obscured the fact that the LNP in fact got a whisker under 50 per cent of vote and the “thumping” part of its majority was delivered by the electoral system, not the voters. Yes, the LNP should have won handsomely and the ALP should have lost badly, but an electoral system should not skew the result in a way that hurts democracy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article first appeared in The Canberra Times on 31 March 2012.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

61 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Crispin Hull is a former editor of The Canberra Times, admitted as a barrister and solicitor in the ACT and author of The High Court 1903-2003 (The Law Book Company). He teaches journalism at the University of Canberra and is chair of Barnardos Australia, the children’s charity. His website is here: www.crispinhullcom.au.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Crispin Hull

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 61 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy