Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The poor art of modelling climate change

By Michael Kile - posted Monday, 26 March 2012

What was Rob Vertessy, the Bureau of Meteorology’s Acting Head, thinking during his recent chat with ABC Radio Nation’s Fran Kelly about BOM-CSIRO’s State of the Climate Report 2012? He used race-track rhetoric to stress that the Bureau know everything they need to know about what drives climate change, and can make confident predictions. Did he have a flutter while studying for his doctorate in fluvial geomorphology at ANU, or during two decades researching catchment and forest hydrology at BOM?

RN: “Two consecutive La Niña weather events have caused a heat wave in Perth while the rest of the nation had a cool, wet summer. But lower temperatures and record rains do not signal a generally cooler or wetter climate. Global warming continues, according” to your report.

FK: “What is your finding on man-made input into these recent changes (unpredicted downpours) and how much are greenhouse gases contributing?”


RV: “We know (anthropogenic) carbon dioxide is the culprit. It’s a lay-down misere. There’s nothing to debate here.”

A misere is a trick-avoidance bid in card games where a player agrees to win no or a few tricks, usually indicating an extremely poor hand. A lay-down misere is a bid where a player is so sure of losing every trick that the player places his hand face-up on the table. In Australian gambling slang this might be referred to as a ‘dead cert’.

Yet there are some big questions that are not a ‘dead cert’. Where are the established laws of climate change? Will stabilising atmospheric CO2 concentration at 450 parts per million really limit global temperature increases to 2C? What evidence supports the ex cathedra claims of government agencies, such as “there is nothing to debate here” and climate change is continuingmultiple lines of evidence show that global warming continues and that human activities are mainly responsible”.

Are they putting the confirmation bias cart before the scientific horse?

That the planet’s climate is changing is hardly news. Perhaps what punters need is a form guide on the climate’s causal linkages and the hard evidence supporting them?

In a speech at a U.K. House of Commons seminar last month, distinguished U.S. atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen summarised the current state of knowledge:


“I will simply try to clarify what the debate over climate change is really about. It most certainly is not about whether climate is changing: it always is. It is not about whether CO2 is increasing: it clearly is. It is not about whether the increase in CO2, by itself, will lead to some warming: it should. The debate is simply over the matter of how much warming the increase in CO2 can lead to, and the connection of such warming to the innumerable claimed catastrophes. The evidence is that the increase in CO2 will lead to very little warming, and that the connection of this minimal warming (or even significant warming) to the purported catastrophes is also minimal. The arguments on which the catastrophic claims are made are extremely weak and commonly acknowledged as such. They are sometimes overtly dishonest.”

The jury seems to be still out on crucial aspects of climate attribution (causation), especially at the regional level, despite emphatic claims about settled and consensus science from the decarbonising crowd.

Another BOM-CSIRO partnership, the Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, admitted as much in its 2011 Technical Report 036: “the degree to which global warming may have enhanced heavy rainfall in some parts of eastern Australia remains uncertain”. The much promoted “current generation of climate models” gave “no clear guidance” as to whether the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), one of the most important drivers of the continent’s weather and climate, “will change in response to global warming. Some models have strengthened ENSOs, some weaker, and others exhibit little if any change”.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Michael Kile is author of No Room at Nature's Mighty Feast: Reflections on the Growth of Humankind. He has an MSc degree from Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London and a Diploma from the College. He also has a BSc (Hons) degree in geology and geophysics from the University of Tasmania and a BA from the University of Western Australia. He is co-author of a recent paper on ancient Mesoamerica, Re-interpreting Codex Cihuacoatl: New Evidence for Climate Change Mitigation by Human Sacrifice, and author of The Aztec solution to climate change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Michael Kile

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy