Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The two hemi-spheres of experience

By Simon Mundy - posted Thursday, 12 January 2012


Finally, I'd like to touch on the question of "so what?" The philosophical and cultural dichotomy that McGilchrist describes has been thoroughly explored by many writers in various contexts. All in their various ways have explored the boundary between the word and Spirit, immediacy, Dasein, authenticity or the many names, inevitably misleading, that we give to that which cannot be named. What, then, is added to the mix by McGilchrist's hypothesis that this dichotomy is fundamental to the way we are, largely because that is the way we, particularly our brains, are built? Is it significant or useful to hold in mind that the structure and function of the organ most strongly associated with our knowing, and indeed of the section of that organ most closely associated with our species' uniqueness, the cortex, is so constituted that it is exactly and inevitably through this dialectic that we make our various senses of the world?

I would say yes. This is a hypothesis, a model, which seeks to describe important aspects of human sense and meaning-making and to ground that description in empirically verifiable accounts of particular behaviours arising from specific structures of our physical bodies. McGilchrist's presentation and argumentation includes all major aspects of the human world: the physical/physiological, the cultural (art, philosophy, language, politics, social structures), science and the subjective. Presenting such an integrated view of these significant aspects of the human, providing a multi-dimensional or multi-phasic view of the aetiology of human sense making, without resorting to an arrogant assertion that, for example, "it's all the hemisphere's, innit?" constitutes a challenge and a measuring stick for all those writing on the relation between our physicality and our subjectivity. How do we talk about that relationship without compromising the humanity of the subject? McGilchrist has, in my opinion, set a fine example.

To my mind, the linking of thought and its permutations to our physicality is culturally potent. As a recent report from the RSA[1] puts it, the natural sciences "enjoy greater epistemic warrant than social sciences" and philosophy. Having these ideas empirically supported changes the terms of the discussion, perhaps not immediately but incrementally. As cultures, all cultures participating in the contemporary expansion of human knowledge, we are still in the early days of understanding ourselves in the light of the knowledge that our brains change as we think. Understanding that we are not, even at the thinking level, machines with parts or programs that are statically arranged or repetitive, but that we are self-transforming at all levels, from the atomic and molecular, through cells, tissues, organs and now even as far as brains. We exist as an unceasing exchange with our environment at atomic and molecular levels and at symbolic, hermeneutic and aetiological levels. We absorb, metabolise and transmit chemical compounds, words, ideas, senses of meaning and value which, again, return to us transformed, through almost infinite variations on that reciprocal relationship to which McGilchrist persistently returns.

Advertisement

Given the early stage of our acquaintance with this emerging picture of ourselves, McGilchrist's hypothesis may be a big cultural leap; possibly too big for immediate digestion. In my opinion, as part of the broad study of embodied consciousness, it begins to ground a constructivist account of our knowing relationship with the world in some physiological specifics. Our ideas about ourselves begin to find reflection, and need to find reflection, in flesh. Not only do we construct our world, but here we may find some guidelines to the regularities and themes we can expect to see in our constructions.

At another level, though, this view also strongly suggests that our philosophies are not arbitrary and purely the conditioned outcome of social forces, economic circumstances, cultural conventions or power relations. We are encouraged to begin to see these relations, again, as reciprocal: these particular organic beings, human beings, ourselves, make sense of and construct their worlds in these particular manners and are, in turn, informed in their construction by the world they, we, eternally re-construct. We can move on from talking about The Right and who knows what it is, to, perhaps, The Good. That being, to some level of approximation, that which is fertile or productive from both left and right hemispheres' points of view: symbolic, useful and formal and immediate, generative and aesthetic. We can be aware of our sometimes dysfunctional reliance on words and their misleading precisions; their siren song that what is spoken about is controlled, complete and known. That illusion whose recurrence and current dominance McGilchrist chronicles: the illusion that ideology, doctrine, intellectual system or liturgy is a complete account of our lives and worlds.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This is a review of  The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, McGilchrist, I. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Simon is a psychotherapist, executive coach and writer working in Sydney and the Blue Mountains. He is concerned with adult human development and well-being both psychological and spiritual. He has been a practising mediator for forty years and applies that experience, the teaching of primarily Buddhist spiritual traditions and a competent lay appreciation of science in all its manifestations, to explore what it means to be human.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Simon Mundy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Simon Mundy
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy