Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Sandilands: offensive, and more

By Helen Pringle - posted Monday, 5 December 2011


So here’s the thing. It is quite possible to be rude and offensive to everyone, at the same time as that part of the offensiveness that is racially targeted can constitute discrimination. Or that part that is sexually targeted. Sandilands’ attack on Alison Stephenson was offensive. As David Penberthy noted, ‘He’s a cretin, a hate-filled belligerent whose talent is in inverse proportion to his offensiveness.’ But Sandilands’ attack was more than offensive, given the terms in which it was publicly made. Sandilands said,

Some fat slag.... What a fat bitter thing you are. You’re deputy editor of an online thing. You’ve got a nothing job anyway. Just so you know, you’re a piece of shit…. Alison, I can tell you, you are supposed to be impartial, you little troll….You’re a bullshit artist, girl. That’s what you are. You should be fired from your job. And your hair, your hair is very 90s. Yeah, and your blouse, you haven’t got that much titty to be having that low cut a blouse. Change your image girl, and watch your mouth, or I will hunt you down.

This is not robust criticism, but an attack and a threat. Here’s what he is saying: uppity women got it coming to them.

Advertisement

Sandilands could not even manage an apology when faced with advertising flight, saying to Stephenson that he had replied to her criticism of his tv show ‘like any normal Australian would do’. And he reiterated that she should take care not to make him angry by getting above her station: ‘If you took a personal offence to it Ali I'm sorry to you, but maybe you should think again before you start going [against] different people.’

Sandilands managed to find some female defenders – so presumably he can’t be sexist. Jackie O predictably came to his defence, although she didn’t close off her options entirely, saying, ‘I don’t think I could ever work with someone who was a woman hater.’ And Wendy Harmer claimed that people were misguidedly ‘playing the gender card’: ‘If Kyle is removed on the charge that he is disrespectful to women, that’s only the half of it and, I believe, merely serves to reinforce the view of males that they are being “got at” by females: “Drink a cup of cement and harden the f***k up!” will be a common response. “Piss off, you ugly old bags,” will be another.’ In other words, pretend to be good girls and try not to make them any more angry with us than they already are.

Intimidation and threats on the basis of race or sex are not just offensive. And pretending that they are simply and only offensive is no path to equality.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Helen Pringle is in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. Her research has been widely recognised by awards from Princeton University, the Fulbright Foundation, the Australian Federation of University Women, and the Universities of Adelaide, Wollongong and NSW. Her main fields of expertise are human rights, ethics in public life, and political theory.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Helen Pringle

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Helen Pringle
Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy