Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

No sweetening the salty tale of water privatisation

By Acacia Rose - posted Friday, 25 November 2011


Soon after the stunning revelation of plans to privatise Australia's water resources, NSW began the process of separating land and water rights, robbing landowners of natural water rights and divesting agricultural wealth through establishing a lucrative, and clearly to small landholders, unaffordable price for tradeable water.

According to a revealing radio interview by the ABC's Peta Donald with National Party Bill Heffernan, the major banks were pushing government to privatise Australia's water. There was no public discussion. There was no referendum YES or NO question or answer as to whether Australian people wanted to privatise their precious water resources or not.

The banks, governments and key politicians plucked water from its status tied to the land as a natural resource, connected to ancient aquifers, ground and surface water, to vast and vulnerable interconnected catchments and their respective streams and rivers, and turned it into a tradeable commodity.

Advertisement

As 'the market' found the right price for water, suddenly, thousands of farmers woke up to discover the non-permanent nature of water licences or entitlements, the over supply of 'licences' and the potential or actual 'stranding' of irrigation assets and therefore, farms and communities. The only way to survive in the brave new water world was to bulk buy as a part of an irrigation consortium.

By June 2009, the Murray Darling Basin Authority took a step further than its conceptual role as an independent best governance, best practice water manager and announced that along with limiting the amount of surface and ground water that could be extracted from the Basin, it would commence water trading.

The States would see the guarantee of their rights to water under Section 100 of the Australian Constitution or equivalent powers, yet would have to abide by the Basin Plan. Soon the dirty depths of cross party politics would be plumbed as the Coalition hijacked the intense mood of farmers who were on the bitter end of an arguably poor communications and education process and saw the proposed Murray Darling Basin Plan and the 'Guide' as no more than a savaging of their water rights, their farms and communities, their livelihoods and regions.

The Coalition cleverly coupled themselves to sequential 'bible burnings' setting the tone for future negotiations. Environment groups rallied to identify and describe minimum sustainable diversions or in the parlance of the report; 'Sustainable Diversion Limits' from the Murray Darling Basin putting themselves directly at odds with the heavily over-capitalised, major corporate agribusinesses who relied directly on water security. The battle lines were drawn across the increasingly salinized soils of the Murray Darling Basin.

Then the rains came. The heavens opened and for two glorious La Nina seasons. The waters flowed from the catchments and sub catchments, from the Murray Darling Basin and its sub-basins filling and overspilling dams and weirs and pouring liquid gold, the unstoppable flow into the wetlands and Murray all the way to the starved Coorong, dousing its acid sulphate soils in fresh runoff.

The Snowy River, dying an agonizing death of 99% extraction for more than 40 years, and struggling under the complex and porous Snowy Water Licence, saw its promised environmental flows traded away at times it appears, as direct allocations for irrigation. No matter the rain, the Upper Snowy River remains totally dead below the all-capturing Island Bend Dam wall. Not a single politician or public servant in the country has the clear will to open the gates at Island Bend and let the Snowy flow.

Advertisement

The Snowy below Jindabyne flowed for the beleaguered Victorian Labor Premier John Brumby crumbling under the weight of controversial irrigation and over priced desal projects. The Snowy River did not help Brumby win the 2010 Victorian State Election even though he came into power on the strength of the Snowy and the election of the key Independent Craig Ingram. An enduring sign of the contempt for 'the environment' by the Snowy water manager Snowy Hydro, is the fencing off of any access to the Jindabyne Dam wall. That fence remains in place after the 2011 spring flows, symbolically imprisoning the river and blocking public access to their iconic Snowy.

Now, with the revelations of the alleged corruption of Labor politicians seeping to the surface through long overdue media exposure, Australians find themselves sucking on the salty plum of expensive and unwanted, foreign owned water infrastructures.

The burden of debt will continue for decades.

John Anderson is wrong. The brave new world of water barons, the globalisation of natural resources, the privatisation and trading of water, air and carbon means that no farmer can rely on any guarantee for any crop unless he or she pays a premium for high security water.

Factored into the costs are the myriad of fees and charges. Factored into water utility and sewerage charges are the repayments on the dozen or so desalination plants mooted for Australia. Factored into the bitter medicine for the dry country, are undoubtedly the millions in windfalls for the politicians who oiled the wheels of water privatisation. Factored into the plan for Australia is the secretive privatisation of our most precious resource – water.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Acacia Rose continues to campaign to stop the sale of the Snowy Hydro and ran as Independent Candidate for Eden-Monaro in the 2007 Federal Election. She is the Alpine Riverkeeper and member of the Waterkeepers Alliance and a member of the Snowy River Alliance. Books by Acacia Rose: Wind Horse series - set in the Snowy Mountains. Midnight Pearl, Azure Moon.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Acacia Rose

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy