Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Middleground

By Richard Stanton - posted Tuesday, 22 November 2011


All the available public spaces including Twitter asked citizens to take sides.

But what about all those in the middle who did not want to take sides? Did not want to align with one or the other?

The majority of those who occupy the middle ground in their everyday socioeconomic lives are now confused about where to go.

Advertisement

They were abandoned by the Liberal National coalition and by the Labor right.

They are now afraid to move too far to the left to embrace the new Labor Greens coalition with its radical notions. Their fear is not unfounded. Common sense tells them that.

They are afraid to embrace Tony Abbott's stark right-of-centre muscularity because not all of them are muscular and not all of them have the capacity to take it on the chin when things get tough. Socioeconomic things.

Neither the Labor Greens political public relations strategy on a clean energy future nor that of the Liberal National coalition on a carbon tax were well-thought through for the longer term.

Now the dust has settle Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard are doing one-eighties. In looking back to the destruction of the centre all they see is the great gaping maw that needs filling.

Ms Gillard sees structural change through the abandonment of anti-bauxite mining policy creating the right atmosphere for her to retake the centre.

Advertisement

Mr Abbott sees a continuation of a promise to abandon legislation on a range of issues as the trigger for the centre to creep towards the right, without knowing it's moving.

Both strategies are flawed and both continue to look to the short term without contemplating the future socioeconomic well-being of the country post-2013.

Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard would do well to think about four rhetorical practices that Leon Mayhew identified while he was watching a presidential campaign in the eighties.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Stanton is a political communication writer and media critic. His most recent book is Do What They Like: The Media In The Australian Election Campaign 2010.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Stanton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy