Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Julia Gillard's u-turn on selling uranium to India exposes Labor's decay

By Marko Beljac - posted Monday, 21 November 2011


But, in reality, within a society dominated by considerations of power and privilege bipartisan support is a reflection of elite consensus on policy. That is why both major political parties support procorporate neoliberal economic restructuring despite the depth of public opposition.

There are other more global matters also to consider.

Recently headlines around the world were devoted to the latest International Atomic Energy Agency report on Iran's past and present nuclear activities.

Advertisement

Iran is alleged to have engaged in a structured programme consistent with an objective to manufacture a nuclear weapon prior to 2003 and that some aspects of that effort continued beyond 2003. Never, either before or after, 2003 has it been established that Iran has conducted weaponisation activities with weapons grade nuclear material, which constitutes a crucial key step in any formal assessment in favour of manufacture.

Under the NPT ambiguity exists as to what constitutes "manufacture" of a nuclear weapon. The information publicly presented suggests that Iran has sought to develop a latent nuclear weapons capability or that it has in fact engaged in activities expressly devoted to the manufacture of a workable nuclear weapon.

Under Article II of the NPT nonnuclear weapon states pledge not to manufacture nuclear weapons nor to procure foreign assistance in the development of nuclear weapons. The prospect, in part, that Iran is violating Article II of the NPT has encouraged further speculation regarding military action against Iran given the importance we attach to nuclear nonproliferation.

The sale of uranium to India is unambiguously a violation of Article III of the NPT. Under this provision a country like Australia cannot provide "source material", which includes uranium, to a state not designated as a nuclear weapons state under the Treaty that does not accept full scope safeguards, defined as being over all nuclear facilities "anywhere."

India will not allow full scope safeguards. The Nuclear Suppliers Group of states have agreed to give India an "exemption" but that merely amounts to an agreement to violate the NPT.

Those who most blow the trumpet of war when discussing Iran's status with respect to Article II of the NPT are the most vocal in expressing support for violation of Article III.

Advertisement

India sits outside the NPT and has an active nuclear weapons programme which includes the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons. The export of uranium to India will, at a minimum (more could be said here but is left aside), free up India's domestic uranium stock to be used for the production of weapons grade fissile material and so serves to assist India's nuclear weapons programme.

In recent years whenever Australia has signed a controversial uranium export treaty a key selling point has been that the country concerned is not producing fissile material for weapons. That is not the case with India.

India is engaged in a strategic arms race with Pakistan. Supporters of uranium exports argue that India has enough nuclear weapons in order to deter Pakistan and so exporting uranium to India will not materially aid Delhi's weapons programme.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Beljac teaches at Swinburne University of Technology, is a board member of the New International Bookshop, and is involved with the Industrial Workers of the World, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union of Workers (community) and Friends of the Earth.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Marko Beljac

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Marko Beljac
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy