Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The Occupy movement – wrong target.

By Justin Jefferson - posted Wednesday, 2 November 2011

The Occupy movement has attracted a lot of mockery for its naivety. Bristling with iPhones, clothes made in China, and pure water in plastic bottles, they really gave me a laugh when they demanded free wi-fi! Most of the scorn is well-deserved but there is a kernel of important truth in their complaints.

To understand it, we must first winnow the wheat from the chaff. For starters, where on earth did they get the idea that the capitalism they are complaining about is “unregulated”?

When asked, no-one can ever name even one unregulated market.


The classic example of unregulated markets that people give is the financial markets. But a quick Google search shows the following regulators:

And that’s just at the federal level, just in the USA, and just in the markets for money and credit.

Reflect that this represents thousands of officials, whose permanent full-time function is to manipulate supply, demand and prices so as to change them from what they would be on the market unhampered by such interventions.

So for anyone concerned with the facts, that rules out unregulated capitalism as a cause of the problem.

Indeed the very idea that the problem is unregulated capitalism only makes sense viewed from the standpoint of full government control of all the means of production – full socialism. Yet no-one will own up to that conclusion.


No, the Occupiers say, the solution is somewhere between the level of big government that we have now, and full socialism. But they can never identify any principle to distinguish the economic interventions that are excessive, from those that are not. The only principle is that in any given case the problem is blamed on unregulated capitalism, and the solution is assumed to be more government intervention. So it’s not a rational belief system: it’s an “if-everything-were-nice-then-wouldn’t-everything-be-nice?” belief system.

Stock markets perform three major economic functions. The Occupiers wrongly criticize all three, when only one is the cause of their valid complaints.

Stock markets negotiate the provision of capital which companies used to produce the goods and services that we all use: the food, clothing, shelter, transport, communications and entertainment. Without capital we would produce everything with our bare hands. While the protestors use all these goods and services more than most other people in the world, their protests about “greed” ring hollow.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Justin Jefferson is an Australian who wishes to show that social co-operation is best and fairest when based in respect for individual freedom.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Justin Jefferson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy