Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Occupy' must understand there is nothing fundamentally wrong with banking

By Mikayla Novak - posted Thursday, 27 October 2011


And the beauty of a truly global financial system is that borrowers may tap into a greater pool of savings therefore securing credit at lower interest rates, while lenders have greater opportunities to diversify their financial portfolios that secure healthy financial returns.

That innumerable private sector operators, large and small, had to borrow funds to fill their financing gaps before producing the everyday conveniences we enjoy today is a point that seems to be lost on the Wall Street occupiers, and many non-occupiers for that matter.

And just like any other business, financial intermediaries have an occasional tendency to go bust. While no financial institution or investment broker in Australia ceased operations during the 2008-09 global financial crisis episodes of bank failures, including as far back as the 1890s, have been a recurring feature in Australian economic history.

Advertisement

There is little question that the closure of any business, whether they be a corner store grocer to a bank with a multinational presence, is of great inconvenience to those personally involved in the venture.

That said the exit of firms usually acts as something of a cleansing process, in which private entities that cannot generate sufficient value get driven out of the market in favour of those who more effectively please their customers and thereby generate economic value.

It is from this perspective that the bailout of firms by governments, at taxpayer expense, is particularly reprehensible and should be opposed at every turn.

By preventing the closure of financial institutions on grounds that they were 'too big to fail,' governments effectively rewarded the practices of bank managers who engaged in overly risky financial practices prior to the GFC as well as shareholders who selected the managers who caused the banks to get into trouble in the first place.

The implicit transfer of wealth from poor taxpayers to rich bankers, who are prevented from being rendered poor as a consequence of bailouts, is another aspect of the bailouts that have not been lost on the Occupy Wall Street protestors.

Arguably the greater problem is what might occur down the track.

Advertisement

Having been rescued from almost certain insolvency by governments in the recent past, financial market participants expect that future governments will repeat a similar bailout strategy should another global economic downturn or significant episode of financial market dysfunction materialise.

And so an element of 'moral hazard' becomes ingrained into the financial system whereby financiers are prepared to finance riskier economic ventures or purchase more securities of dubious financial backing, than would otherwise be the case, safe in the knowledge that a future government will rescue them anyway.

While it is convenient for the occupiers, with an inherent bias against market capitalism, to sheet home the entire blame for these unwelcome developments to the financial sector lobbyists who no doubt secured bailout arrangements much to their liking, they seem to miss the point.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mikayla Novak is a Research Fellow with the Institute of Public Affairs. She has previously worked for Commonwealth and State public sector agencies, including the Commonwealth Treasury and Productivity Commission. Mikayla was also previously advisor to the Queensland Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Her opinion pieces have been published in The Australian, Australian Financial Review, The Age, and The Courier-Mail, on issues ranging from state public finances to social services reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mikayla Novak

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy