Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Compromise and policy balance are shaping Gillard’s minority government

By James English - posted Monday, 26 September 2011


If most people are going to be better off, why did the poll produce this result? The problem is that nobody is supporting the policy – because nobody really got what they wanted. The Greens got a carbon tax, but it's not as strong as they'd like.

Environmentalists are struggling to see real benefit because too many high-polluting industries are exempt. Green voters in general are not supporting the tax because it does not yet achieve what the Greens sought. On the other hand, the Coalition never wanted a tax in the first place. What do they care about exemptions?

Gillard's compromise between Green, Labor, Liberal and independent positions is producing a situation where nobody is satisfied. To avoid adverse economic impact, Gillard has gone soft on the environmental goals of a carbon tax and focused on the economic issues.

Advertisement

The result is an even weaker environment policy and there are no political winners. Without support from either side, and without a consistent moral argument for the government about the environmental and generational benefits of a carbon reduction program, the public is susceptible to Abbot's claim that it is little more than a 'big new tax'. New agendas create confusion, and without a strong sell on the moral, generational or environmental benefits, the public will always fear the worst and focus on the word 'tax'.

Asylum seeker compromise

Labor's other headline problem – asylum seekers – is also suffering from compromise.

In 2007, Rudd promised to dismantle Howard's Pacific Solution. One of his first actions as Prime Minister was to stop sending asylum seekers to Nauru. Since then, the Rudd and Gillard governments have mostly fulfilled their promise of removing children from detention centres. Abbott's ongoing assertion that Labor cannot 'stop the boats' has however caused Labor to change its position.

Enter the Malaysian Solution – as close as Labor can come to Liberal policy without sending people back to Nauru. By adopting this policy, Gillard has had to compromise between Liberal-style deterrence and Labor-inspired social democratic and egalitarian values.

The clash is noticeable when the Government, particularly the Minister for Immigration Chris Bowen, is seeking to recognise 'the sovereignty of states in determining their own immigration policy' and expressing a desire for international cooperation.

Advertisement

Domestically, the Malaysian Solution is aimed at boat people, deciding in Howard-like fashion who comes into this country and the manner in which they do. Internationally, it is part of the regional cooperation framework advanced by Prime Minister Gillard. The rhetoric is along the line of 'tackling' people smuggling with 'cooperative arrangements', but the people affected are the asylum seekers themselves.

Even if the Malaysian Solution goes ahead, Gillard is caught between appeasing the Coalition and the Australian public, and appearing to be a good global citizen. Nothing that she says can lean too far to one side for the risk of alienating the other. Rather than selling one policy, Gillard is balancing two, while walking the tightrope of minority government.

The policies of the Gillard Government are not as bad as they are made out to be. The carbon tax takes a step to address climate change, but avoids damaging the economy. The Malaysian Solution was an attempt to stop the boats while engaging in a South-East Asian regional framework.

But through compromise, Gillard has left herself fighting both sides of each debate. The Liberals and the Greens have chosen their corners, each swiping away at the parts of the policies they don't agree with.

Labor stands in the middle holding each at bay.

None of the parties or the independents are really getting what they want. It seems it is just too hard to sell a minority government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

James holds degrees in Law and Arts (Politics) from the University of New South Wales. His research interests include Australian politics, political philosophy, human rights and public law.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by James English

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of James English
Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy