Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Same cracks, just a new coat of paint

By Adam Creighton - posted Friday, 9 September 2011


For a start, NSW's net debt is extremely low, less than 3% of the Gross State Product of NSW. Compare that with about 7% at the Commonwealth level.

Why should the arbitrary ratios of discredited rating organisations like S&P and Moody's retard NSW's development? Debt is entirely appropriate for large-scale public works using proven technologies. NSW, with a growing economy and population, should willingly go into significant debt.

In any case, were NSW's credit rating to fall a notch, the extra cost of additional debt would likely be only a few extra basis points, a very small cost to bear.

Advertisement

Infrastructure spending is crimped at the local level too; the Minister for Local Government, alone among Australian states, imposes caps on rate increases by local councils.

The government's mooted Waratah bonds, if successfully offered to retail investors, might remind voters that debt can be beneficial if the proceeds are spent wisely.

Nor did the NSW budget make any attempt to reform the state's moribund taxes. States taxes are overwhelmingly the most damaging. The Henry review showed last year that stamp duties on insurance policies inflict an economic loss on society about three times that of income tax. Stamp duties on property are four times at damaging as land taxes.

If the NSW government cared about long-run economic welfare, it would abolish these taxes, and broaden the base and lower the rates of land and payroll tax to make up for it – short-term pain for very significant long-term gain.

The Henry review considered at length the benefits of swapping motor vehicle registration for an intelligent congestion tax. Indeed, the Liberal party's pre-election manifesto claimed "urban congestion costs NSW more than $4 billion in lost productivity each year", yet the budget proposes to do little about it.

If the NSW budget is pusillanimous the Commonwealth must wear some of the blame, notwithstanding the government's less favourable numbers in the upper house. Decades of meddling with states' policies and undermining their financial independence have taken their toll.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Australian Financial Review on September 7, 2011



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Adam Creighton is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Adam Creighton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy