Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Denying childhood: Exploitation and the body image of six-year olds

By Jocelynne Scutt - posted Friday, 9 September 2011


When a mother goes on Good Morning America purporting to administer Botoxinjections to her daughter, the public’s response is to demand the intervention of social services. The mother’s response is to assert it was all a publicity stunt – to get herself and her daughter nation- or even world-wide coverage on popular television.

Should the public take a backseat and social services withdraw in recognition that the episode was a mother and daughter bonding exercise? Or that for them, ‘Good Morning America was ‘fun’?

Fashion week organisers are becoming more mindful of the negative effects of the search for slimmer and slimmer (or skinnier and skinnier) models, younger and younger bodies on the catwalk. Advertisers may be more alert to this as an issue, too.

Advertisement

If the fashion industry recognises there is a problem - why not beauty contest organisers? If there is a furor within an industry where the very youngest mannequins used have been 14-years-old or perhaps twelve, how can there be no concern where six-year-olds are being influenced to believe that the body is all – and it must be slender, primped, preened and ‘perfected’, even if achieved by ‘natural’ means?

When demonstrators gathered peacefully to protest the holding of the beauty contest in Melbourne, the mother of the featured child – both of whom had travelled from the U.S. to appear in the show – withdrew because she ‘feared for her child’s safety’.

In the light of ‘Maggie Goes on a Diet’, surely our fear should be not only for the health and safety of children who may be encouraged to embark on a lifetime of dieting and the dangers this embodies. Nor should it be limited to concerns as to the emphasis on body size and shape leading to eating disorders that can result in death. We should fear for the loss of childhood of all children who live in a world where body image dictates the way they see themselves, their relationship to the world, and their very identity.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Jocelynne A. Scutt is a Barrister and Human Rights Lawyer in Mellbourne and Sydney. Her web site is here. She is also chair of Women Worldwide Advancing Freedom and Dignity.

She is also Visiting Fellow, Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jocelynne Scutt

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy