Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Breaking the Sheep’s Back: A review of the Australian wool industry and government intervention

By Mark S. Lawson - posted Monday, 22 August 2011


Massy’s book is not history as the term is generally understood. The last chapters are opinion and, although the author has obviously worked hard to get the fact rights, he still leaves out important details. For example, readers are told that there were referendums on the reserve price scheme in the 1960s, but Massy neglects to say who arranged the referendums and doesn’t clarify if woolgrowers voted, what the deal was concerning the vote, and what the results were.

All that said the book remains a good read and immensely informative about many of the details that remained murky at the time. It also remains an excellent object lesson for those who want to return to the bad old days of high tariffs and what use to be called agrarian socialism. The wool reserve price scheme was an effort to be caring and protect a deserving set of individuals, namely woolgrowers, from the rigours of the market. Instead it ended up badly hurting the very group it was trying to protect.

Massy points out that the reserve price scheme and industry structure hurt the industry in many ways. Wool buyers did not like being gouged by what amounted to a cartel and, crucially, there was no incentive for suppliers to innovate. In particular, only token efforts were made to counter growing market competition from cotton and synthetic fibres, by developing improved wool products. Woolgrowers kept shearing sheep and sending the material off, more or less as they had always done.

Advertisement

This was bad policy, underpinned by bad ideology. Those who defy the markets will eventually lose. They may lose slowly, or lose in a spectacular collapse, but they will lose. The wool industry has yet to recover.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

36 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Lawson is a senior journalist at the Australian Financial Review. He has written The Zen of Being Grumpy (Connor Court).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark S. Lawson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark S. Lawson
Article Tools
Comment 36 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy