Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Climate change at Radio National

By Valerie Yule - posted Friday, 12 August 2011


The Australian Broadcasting Commission's Radio National stands accused of left or right bias by people who obviously do not listen comprehensively. There is a serious bias, however, and that is increasing loss of intelligent programming.

Originally Radio National, the national flagship of Australian radio, was designed to raise the intelligence of the nation, beginning with the children and teenagers. Now intentionally or not, it is designed to reduce the intelligence of the nation.

Once Radio National was upmarket. It had programs for children and teenagers so they were likely to graduate to the 'thinking' programs as they grew up. It had programs for ordinary people that raised the standard for them including panel-games, quizzes, practical information for homemakers and gardeners - to introduce them to the station so that they were likely to continue to listen to the programs of national importance. Once it had a wider range of music than it has now, although now it has nine music programs plus pieces of music that are played about hourly. Some programs today are non-sequential 'collages' of voices and music, which prevent thoughtful following, but are fun no doubt to make and have a modernist flavour.

Advertisement

Radio National has now about 2% of the listening audience, mostly over fifty. This older audience I think, dislikes much of the music, the stream-of-consciousness, the longer stings, and over-use of promos, although listener surveys (when are they?) may disprove my opinion.

For those who do not yet listen to Radio National, and may have untested prejudices, here are the facts about its programs. You yourself can find out the bias on each one.

Programs cover 22 categories - arts, books, business, community, design, education, environment, family, health, history, indigenous, law, media, music, philosophy, political, religion, rural, science, sport and war.

There are 62 programs, many repeated in the night hours, plus 5-8 minutes of News, every hour. .

Eight are music programs - Into the Music, Music Deli, Night Air Live, Night Air, Quiet Space, Rhythm Divine, Sound Quality, Story of Pop

Eight are political programs - a.m, Asia Pacific, Background Briefing, Breakfast, Correspondents' Report, Hindsight, p.m, World Today

Advertisement

Eight are political and social – Australia Talks, Big Ideas, Boyar Lectures, Classic Late Night Live, Counterpoint, Late Night live, National Interest, Saturday Extra

Twenty-six are specialty programs –All in the mind (Psychology), Artworks (Art), Away (Indigenous), Book Show, Bush Telegraph (Country), By Design (Design), Comedy, Country Breakfast (Country), Elsewhere (Travel), Encounter (Religion), First Person (Biography), Future Tense (Future), Health report, Law report, Life Matters, Lingua Franca (Language), Movie Time, New Dimensions (Environmental), Ockham's Razor (Science), Philosophers Zone, Poetica, Rear Vision (History), Edpol (Education)], Science Show, Spirit of Things (Religion), Verbatim (Biographical).

Nine are mixed content, sometimes very mixed - Airplay, Daily Planet, Garrison Keilor's Radio Show, Playing the 20th Century, Replay, RN Shuffle, The Lonely Hearts Club, This American Life, Weekend Planet.

The News is skimpy, often in no particular order, for example, someone falling off a motor bike preceding a revolution in another country. This sort of thing is particularly likely with the 7 o'clock news. Most detail is given to particular sports news, with exerpts from sportsmen's comments. There are a few regular news-readers, but many seem to come on once only, for some reason.

Nowadays the audience for talks is said to be mainly over 60 years in age. The older audience has changes in its hearing – the higher frequencies for voices become less audible, the lower frequencies for drums become overbearing. Muttered female voices, being highest register, become inaudible to many. Noise-music hides the talking for 18% of Radio National audience – possibly more. Talk programs have stings between sections; the stings have got longer and longer.

To make up it seems for the advertising on commercial radio, every hour there are promos for programs to come. Lately, promos have been played in the middle of other programs, e.g. Life Matters and By Design. This is infuriating for listeners, and makes thinking difficult. These promos get longer and longer, until you feel you have heard the entire program already. A promo for David Hume on the Philosopher's Zone was repeated at least twenty times – or it seemed like it – and at last I did not listen to the program, up my alley though it was. There can be two promos of at least two minutes before the News, plus one after. Will it get any worse? Promos used to be between the talk programs. Now they come at any time, including in the middle of talk programs. The same one can be repeated up to twenty times, it seems.

To fill in the space between proper programs and the News, often a lot of music is played which is anti-thinking. By this I mean that Radio National has too often abandoned music that has melody and sequence for music that consists of the same phrase repeated up to thirty times. The music played is often highly reliant on repetitive drumming which could be done by machines, and too much of it consists of one line of music or lyrics repeated for up to twenty times. One cannot think while it is on, but cannot tell when it will end. Surely the proper programs could be longer to fill the space.

The 5.30 am slot, which is mainly listened to by the sleepless, depressed, suicidal and ageing, may be at risk to be shorn of its life-giving content of comedy, laughs and games. Yet this is the time it is most needed. On Sundays we now have items such as Method Acting and Richard Dawkins – heavy stuff for 5.30 in the morning.

I am told there are listener surveys, but cannot find when they are. Why not?

Australia needs a radio station catering for intelligence if it wants to be the Clever Country and stand respected internationally. It cannot by definition have high ratings, because only ten per cent of the population has high intelligence. But it could have that 10% of listeners, not the 2% attributed to it. People of all degrees of intelligence could listen to particular programs that appealed to them – the Science Shows are one example.

This is not a matter of elitism, it is a matter of necessity, and we should all contribute our taxes to keeping it going. It should be clear from this report that changes are needed, and these changes should not to be to go down-market. The airwaves have more than enough that is at average level and below.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

39 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Valerie Yule is a writer and researcher on imagination, literacy and social issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Valerie Yule

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Valerie Yule
Article Tools
Comment 39 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy