Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Chance for uranium diplomacy

By Thom Woodroofe - posted Wednesday, 15 June 2011


The world was understandably shocked by the events of Fukushima that continue to drag on.

A month before, I wrote in this newspaper urging the Gillard Government to overturn its uranium export ban to India which has become a bad symbol of our diplomatic relationship.

At the time, I held out hope that when the Indian Manmohan Singh visits Perth in October for a Commonwealth Meeting that he would extend the trip to a bilateral visit during which a reversal in Australia's policy could be announced.

Advertisement

But this now looks increasingly unlikely.

The zero-sum mentality of the ban is based on the fact that despite India already being a nuclear power they have not signed the archaic and exclusive nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

The reality is that the world's appetite for Australia's uranium will not slow in the wake of the Japanese disaster.

This was highlighted last week in Perth by the Resources Minister Martin Ferguson – himself a closet supporter of nuclear power in Australia – when he said "What Fukushima will not do is change the fundamental drivers, the increasing population and increasing demand for energy that are behind the desire by some nations for more nuclear power".

And he is right.

While several of the four hundred nuclear reactors around the world were shut down in the wake of Fukushima, the vast bulk continue to operate. These, coupled with increasing global demand from countries such as India – which plans a tenfold increase in nuclear power to 2050 – will keep the world's eyes firmly focused on Australia.

Advertisement

Australia is home to forty percent of the world's uranium reserves with approximately $9 billion of that in Western Australia. This provides Australia with unique leverage to use these reserves as currency to do good in the world.

On nuclear non-proliferation, this could take the form of embedding various bilateral agreements on use into our uranium trade deals with countries like India rather than relying on them to simply sign the NPT.

For instance some have argued that by selling India uranium we could make it conditional on a cessation of the production of fissile material for weapons. This would be a markedly different approach to the NPT all or nothing agenda which achieves zero with India as a non-signatory.

Such actions would not be without basis.

In 2006, Australia and China signed a bilateral agreement on the peaceful use of nuclear energy and current negotiations with the United Arab Emirates are heavily focused on a similar outcome.

Similar arrangements can also promote safety and standards on nuclear power.

This is something the Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd understands writing recently that "We should use what we have learned from promoting (proliferation) safeguards to also promote safety in viable ways."

Present arrangements between a country and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are not sufficient lacking any means of enforcement. But a bilateral agreement on the supply of uranium to a reactor, contingent on IAEA safety standards being upheld, would add a measurable safeguard beyond current practise.

But the immaturity with which our domestic political discourse views nuclear power – unable to grow out of a nappy like approach that considers even the debate of the topic politically toxic – has infected our wider foreign policy and risks overshadowing these possibilities.

For far too long, Australia's foreign policy elite have either overlooked or completely misunderstood the diplomacy of uranium.

It would be completely ridiculous to think that nuclear power or arms proliferation will not continue in the wake of the Japanese crisis.

It will, and as it does, we have a real opportunity to leverage our uranium reserves to not only usher greater safety standards in the nuclear power industry but to redouble our efforts on non-proliferation.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was originally published in the West Australian, on June 13, 2011.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Thom Woodroofe, 21, is a foreign affairs analyst combining journalism, research, teaching and community work to advance an understanding of Australia's place in the world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Thom Woodroofe

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Thom Woodroofe
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy