Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Who is denying what?

By Peter McCloy - posted Monday, 13 June 2011


Al, Cate and Bob are telling us that it's OK to use as much energy as you like, as long as somebody, preferably someone else, pays for it.

Nothing Australia can do will have any appreciable positive effect. The world will not be inspired by our efforts. Falling on our swords will not be admired, it will not even be noticed by most of the world's population.

It is very likely that our efforts will exacerbate the problem.

Advertisement

Talk about shutting down our coal mines is dangerous nonsense. About 75% of our coal production is exported – about 105 million tonnes of steaming coal and 110 million tonnes of coking coal annually. It is exported to more than 35 countries – mainly Asia, but also to Europe, India, North Africa, the Middle East and South America.

Our coals have a high energy content and are low in non-combustible impurities, and are thus less polluting than coal from most other sources. They are particularly low in sulphur. If we were to close down the Australian coal mining industry partially or completely, the coal would be mined elsewhere, and would almost certainly be more polluting than Australian coal.

The net result would be an increase in global emissions at the cost of more than 21,000 jobs.

Our aluminium industry is already suffering through uncertainty about electricity cost, and jobs have been lost. A carbon tax will reduce Australia's international competitiveness.

The Australian industry is built on world demand for alumina and aluminium - over 80 per cent of Australian production is exported.

In 2008 Paul Howes of the AWU told a climate change conference in Sydney that 20,000 jobs were at risk. "Every tonne of alumina made in Western Australia uses half the energy and produces less than half the greenhouse emissions than if it was made in China. This is a critical point missed by those calling for industry to be shut down and Australian jobs offered offshore." I don't know what he's saying now.

Advertisement

China's aluminium sector has doubled its output in the past few years to 13 million tonnes from 80 smelters compared with six operating in Australia. Aluminium is Australia's third-biggest commodity export behind coal and steel. Sacrificing it will increase global emissions and cost jobs.

What can Australia do? Concentrate on doing what we do well – providing clean coal and encouraging a highly efficient alumina industry for example.

Recognising, as most of the world does, that coal will be the major source of energy for the foreseeable future, and researching technologies that make it safer and cleaner. Encouraging research into renewable or sustainable generation of power and the technology to store it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter McCloy is an author and speaker, now retired, who lives on five acres of rock in an ecologically sensible home in the bush. He is working on a 20,000-year plan to develop his property, and occasionally puts pen to paper, especially when sufficiently aroused by politicians. He is a foundation member of the Climate Sceptics. Politically, Peter is a Lennonist - like John, he believes that everything a politician touches turns to sh*t.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter McCloy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter McCloy
Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy