Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Education revolution needs to devolve to evolve

By Kevin Donnelly - posted Thursday, 24 March 2011


As Minister for Education and now as Prime Minister, Julia Gillard has championed national testing and making results public. Based on the example of New York, when schools were under the control of Joel Klein, Gillard argues that the best way to raise standards is to make test results public on the My School website.

Some moths ago, Barry O'Farrell was criticised for supporting those fearful that making test results public would lead to league tables and naming and shaming schools. Events have proven O'Farrell correct.

In New York, Joel Klein's testing and accountability regime is being criticised for failing to raise standards, for inflating results and for having a destructive impact on the classroom. Australian teachers now refer to the national literacy and numeracy tests as NAPALM and test experts, like Dr Margaret Wu, at The University of Melbourne, have serious doubts about the validity and reliability of the test results.

Advertisement

Speak to teachers and school leaders across Australia and it soon becomes obvious that the rate and scope of the Rudd/Gillard education revolution has exhausted teachers, weakened morale and, counter to the ALP inspired rhetoric, made teaching more onerous and difficult.

Beginning teachers leave after 4 to 5 years, long serving teachers are retiring early and school leaders are suffering record levels of stress and anxiety.

Based on the assumption that a Liberal/National Coalition Government will be more sympathetic to the realities of the classroom and the needs of teachers and school leaders, there is a good chance that an O'Farrell Government will forsake the rhetoric of an education revolution and give priority to empowering schools and better supporting teachers in getting on with the job.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and he recently co-chaired the review of the Australian national curriculum. He can be contacted at kevind@netspace.net.au. He is author of Australia’s Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars available to purchase at www.edstandards.com.au

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Donnelly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Donnelly
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy