Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Grown up girls take responsibility

By Jennifer Wilson - posted Friday, 4 March 2011


The outrage against Victoria's Secret and the Lea Michele frock nonsense have taken their protests into a whole other area, and one that raises questions about Reist and Funnell's judgment.

In order to interpret the world as they apparently do, you have to start from the position that there is something fundamentally wrong with all public representation of female sexuality. Any expression and representation of female sexuality is dangerous for women one way or another, according to this perspective, and it has to be stopped.

I have not read of either of these campaigners offering alternative representations to those they critique, so I'm beginning to conclude they don't have any. Perhaps they really don't believe there can be any such thing as an acceptable public representation of female sexuality, like the Taliban.

Advertisement

Public displays of female flesh lead inevitably to a culture of exploitation and rape, turning sane men mad, apparently. All those KanYe West and Brian McFadden lyrics churning round in their animal minds, causing them to lose what little sense of decency they might just have been born with, if they were lucky, and then, dammit, a woman in a thong hoves into view, and it's not on her foot, either.

In the world these campaigners inhabit, not only are all women too stupid to know if they're being exploited, all men are too base to think about a woman as anything more than a root, a drunken root if possible, or if it's KanYe West we're talking about, a dead root.

If I'm wrong, and they do think there's an acceptable way to publicly show off the female body, then it's time they told us what it is, because their unrelenting negativity, their lack of any positive options for women who want to enjoy and share their sexual beauty and power, is becoming very wearing.

There's nothing wrong with desire, and cleavage

Personally, I think the human body can be breathtaking, and I see no reason for it to be treated as something that must be hidden for fear of the desires it might arouse. There's nothing wrong with desire, either, it's one of the driving creative forces in the world. It should be aroused.

Calling for the end of the "sexification" of women is not much different to telling women we are responsible for men's bad behaviour because of the way we dress ourselves. If we want to "sexify" why shouldn't we? We are sexual beings, sex is a fabulous thing; some of us like looking sexy, and men have to deal with that. We aren't going round in potato sacks because they allegedly can't keep it in their pants.

Advertisement

The majority of men do deal with it, admire the sexuality, and behave. Some don't, and I'd venture to suggest that they wouldn't anyway. Rape is nothing new, it happened when we were covered from head to toe, and you don't have to be overtly sexy or dressed in revealing clothing to be raped, as we very well know. Rape frequently has little to do with sex, and lots to do with power.

Lacy panties and balconette bras might not be everybody's choice, but there's room for them in the world. There's nothing wrong with you, ladies, if you want to wear them and you feel good in them. Don't let anybody tell you there is. Go for it. Cleavage can be wondrous.

It's insultingly reductionist to peddle the theory that because a man (or a woman) admires a lovely body, he or she automatically doesn't give a toss about anything else that human being has to offer.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

217 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Jennifer Wilson worked with adult survivors of child abuse for 20 years. On leaving clinical practice she returned to academia, where she taught critical theory and creative writing, and pursued her interest in human rights, popular cultural representations of death and dying, and forgiveness. Dr Wilson has presented papers on human rights and other issues at Oxford, Barcelona, and East London Universities, as well as at several international human rights conferences. Her academic work has been published in national and international journals. Her fiction has also appeared in several anthologies. She is currently working on a secular exploration of forgiveness, and a collection of essays. She blogs at http://www.noplaceforsheep.wordpress.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jennifer Wilson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 217 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy