Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hell, Holy Land holidays and hope

By Alan Matheson - posted Friday, 4 March 2011


When ACCESS (Victoria), St. James Institute (Sydney), Ridley Theological College (Melbourne), or individual pastors and priests, take Holy Land tours under the tight control of a travel agency itinerary, what they see, according to the Palestinian church, "only reinforces their prejudices, preconceived notions and limited understanding of a complex situation."

What such tour leaders and participants fail to understand is that, "tourism. . . is used by the Israelis as a tool for occupation and dispossession. External tourism agents that collaborate in this process are complicit in facilitating gross human rights violations and injustices. They are in fact supporting the trading in, and profiting from, stolen goods, stolen lands and broken lives."

A recent Palestinian tourism investigation concluded that "the monopoly held by the Israeli travel sector and its state policies continues to cripple the growth of the Palestinian travel sector."

Advertisement

Ttherefore, can the Australian Christian tourist be neutral? No. "If you are neutral in situations of injustice," according to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, "you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality."

So how is it then, that an organisation such as ACCESS, with a ministry full of children, use the excuse of not offending the 'conscience' of participants, when it goes out of its way to avoid learning anything about the hell suffered by Palestinian children?

Why would they deliberately shield chaplains and teachers from the facts? It is estimated that "74 percent of Palestinian children in East Jerusalem live below the poverty line, 80 percent of the people in Gaza depend on food aid, and children in nearly a third of all families in the occupied Palestinian territories experience anxiety, phobia or depression."

Why would it conclude that it would be better if their chaplains knew nothing of the recent report, "Palestinian Child Prisoners: The systematic and institutionalised ill-treatment and torture of Palestinian children by Israeli authorities?" (Defence International Report-Palestine).

The Principal of Ridley is courageously traveling Australia, pleading with Anglicans to recognise that they stole land from the original Aboriginal inhabitants, and that the time has come for repentance and compensation. Yet the Ridley tour will drop by the Shepherds Field, and ensure that its group learns nothing of the appropriation of Palestinian land. The tour ignores Beit Sahur, its tax revolt and its non violent struggle.

The St.James Institute group, after visiting the Knesset, the Israeli Museum and Yad Vashem, will gently nod off to sleep, undisturbed by the cries and anguish of another Palestinian family whose house has been demolished down the street.

Advertisement

How is it that these tours lead by bishops, priests and pastors, can find time to visit boutique wineries, indulge in shopping and float in the Dead Sea, but can never find time to share in worship at St.Georges Cathedral or any other church? How do the Boards of these organisations support such travel?

How does all this happen? Is it the fault of the travel agencies? One travel agency noted that, "evangelicals never request visits with Palestinian Christians." Are organisations like St. James Institute and ACCESS and their leaders, lazy, insensitive, or unconcerned? Or, is it what the National Council of Churches of Australia calls, "indifference?"

By all means, visit the Church of the Nativity, but it's deceptive and dishonest, if ACCESS decides that it would offend the "conscience of participants," if they were to meet with Palestinians and hear about the devastating effect of the 8m wall surrounding Bethlehem, or hear Israeli soldiers recounting stories of, "tightening control over the civilian population and instituting fear." (Breaking the Silence).

What is it about "conscience" which prevents the ACCESS tourists from hearing and understanding "the cry of hope in the absence of all hope?" ("Kairos Palestine: A moment of truth - A word of faith, hope and love from the Palestinian suffering," 2009).

"You Westerners," said, Father Elias Chacour, "have been coming to the Holy Land for centuries to visit the shrines, the dead stones. But you do not see the living stones - the human beings who live and struggle before your eyes. I say 'Wake up"' what matters are the living stones!"

There's no such thing as a 'neutral' Holy Land holiday. You're either a part of the machinery of oppression and struggle, or an agent of solidarity and hope.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Kali Goldstone.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Alan Matheson is a retired Churches of Christ minister who worked in a migration centre in Melbourne, then the human rights program of the World Council of Churches, before returning to take responsibility for the international program of the ACTU.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Alan Matheson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Alan Matheson
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy