Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Australia lagging international human rights standards

By Malcolm Fraser - posted Friday, 18 February 2011

This aritlce is by the Rt Hon Malcolm Fraser AC CH GCL PC and 32 other leading Australians

Australia has faced questioning at the United Nations by member states and independent experts regarding its Indigenous policies. The failure to restore the rights of Aboriginal people is currently being scrutinised under the Universal Periodic Review process of the UN Human Rights Council and was criticised in 2010 by both the UN Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Such scrutiny can only reveal just how far Australia is lagging behind international standards on human rights policies. Changes are urgently needed.

In such a context, we have become increasingly concerned by the failure of the Federal Government, with the tacit support of the Opposition, to properly address problems facing Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory. In particular, the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER, also ‘the Intervention’) has been progressed without credible consultation with, or the approval of, Aboriginal people.


While there are some limited aspects of the Intervention that have been viewed positively in some Aboriginal communities, it is the compulsory nature of the policies which are of concern.

It is our belief that inequality cannot be addressed by the removal of control from affected peoples over their lives and land, as is current government policy. Positive change requires respect and genuine engagement with the people themselves at the local level, rather than an isolated policy development in Canberra.

Examples of the failure of policies include:

  • the delayed, incomplete and flawed reinstatement of the Racial Discrimination Act
  • the entrenchment of discrimination against Aborigines in the criminal law of the Northern Territory by failing to repeal s.91 of the NTER Act which ensures that no customary law or cultural practice, excuses, justifies, authorises, requires or lessens the seriousness of any criminal behaviour with which the Crimes Act is concerned
  • the retention and widening of involuntary income management in order to give it a veneer of non discrimination
  •  the failure to provide proper housing exemplified by the slow pace of doing so, and the fact that of the new houses built by government under the Strategic Indigenous Housing and Infrastructure Program (SIHIP) to alleviate overcrowding (information provided by FaHCSIA), there is a failure to take into account the size or requirements of the average Aboriginal family
  • the failure to provide full time education to Aboriginal children, which is a right of all Australian children. Examples include:

    The fact that the 45 Aboriginal Homeland Learning Centres for which the NT Department of Education and Training is responsible have never been allocated full-time qualified teachers and are reliant on fly-in fly-out teachers, often for only one or two days per week.

    The failure of NTER measures such as the policy of removal of welfare entitlements where there is unsatisfactory school attendance, in that recent figures from the NT Department of Education show a steady fall in attendance at schools in very remote areas between 2006-07 and 2009-10.

  • Maintaining the Intervention despite evidence such as:

    The Health Impact Assessment launched in March 2010, which found that the Intervention could potentially lead to profound long-term damage to overall health and cultural integrity.


The 2010 Enquiry into NT Child Protection which links health problems to community disadvantage and poverty associated with overcrowding, unsafe and stressful environments, poor community infrastructure, poor nutrition and limited health care, all of which were supposed to have been addressed by the Intervention.

The government’s policy approach must move from one of bureaucratic control by Canberra to one of recognition of Aboriginal leadership, negotiation, capacity building and direct input by Aboriginal people to local government decision-making. Without direct engagement with Aboriginal people, policy changes will fail. With Aboriginal leaders, government must commit to a policy of support by developing economies, encouraging investment and creating jobs by improving transport and communication systems, and where appropriate, the use of taxation incentives.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

73 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm Fraser was Prime Minister of Australia between 1975 and 1983.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm Fraser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 73 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy