Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Don't mention the floods

By Tim O'Dwyer - posted Monday, 17 January 2011

There are no legal restrictions in Queensland, or elsewhere across the nation, on selling flood-affected real estate, although local councils may require people building new homes or extending existing ones to ensure floor levels are above specified flood levels. Incidentally, in Queensland, council flood search replies received by buyers’ solicitors invariably give “no warranty” on the “accuracy of the information”.

When I pressed my Law Society on the need for a consumer-protective contract flood clause I received this unhelpful reply, which only a lawyer could have crafted: “Whether or not the standard contract included a clause which in effect said the sale was subject to the property not being flood-affected was considered. It was decided that such a clause would be extremely difficult to draft given the nature of flooding records kept by various local authorities and that, in the standard contract, the clause was probably not necessary.”

At the same time I asked Queensland’s Office of Fair Trading, on behalf of an unhappy home-buyer, if estate agents should disclose flood information. The answer was classic Catch 22, and no more helpful: “You have raised concerns that the contract entered into by your client related to property which was found to have been substantially flooded and this information was not provided to her… It is considered it is not generally the function of an estate agent to provide information available from searches of local authority records.”


When Fair Trading prosecuted an agent for not revealing what he knew about a property’s termite damage, the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal ruled that the “prudent course” for the agent was “to remain silent” and let the buyers pursue their own enquiries. No matter that the Tribunal failed to consider that, by law, misleading conduct includes “wilful concealment of a material fact”. So far as I am aware, the only real estate agency ever successfully prosecuted for “misleading conduct by silence” was the New South Wales L.J. Hooker agency which sold a home without disclosing that it had been the scene of a triple murder.

So if you are looking to buy in Queensland, or anywhere else for that matter, remember to ask about flooding. No matter what sort of reply you receive, still make your own independent enquiries. And ensure your solicitor adds a special contract condition permitting you to cancel if council searches reveal the watery worst. Your solicitor won’t find such a condition too difficult to draft. (By the way, here’s a tip from my own personal experience. If you’re looking to buy or rent, and have your suspicions about past flooding, just ask any long-term and long-memoried neighbour!)

What of flood-prone real estate disclosure elsewhere in Australia? Please correct me if I’m wrong, but to my knowledge, there are no laws anywhere specifically requiring auctioneers, agents or owners to disclose flood information to prospective buyers or tenants. Only the Northern Territory and Tasmanian governments are in the process of finalising pre-contract disclosure laws.

Not that Tasmanian sellers will have to give buyers specific flood information. It seems that Apple Isle buyers will receive only a general warning like this:

“The property may be subject to periodic flooding (i.e. when land that is not usually submerged by water is flooded every so often) or located in a flood-prone area (an area that has a tendency to become submerged by water frequently). It is therefore in your interest to undertake an investigation as to whether or not the property is affected or prone to be affected by flooding before you commit yourself to buy.”.

On the other hand, the Northern Territory’s draft disclosure regulation stipulates that the seller must provide a declaration stating “information known to the seller” about whether the property being sold has “previously been flooded”.


Finally, the best news for owners of currently flooded properties is that white-ants probably can’t swim!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim O’Dwyer is a Queensland Solicitor. See Tim’s real estate writings at:

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim O'Dwyer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim O'Dwyer
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy