Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Victories and disasters in planning.

By Robert Gibbons - posted Thursday, 6 January 2011


Chamberlain’s municipal programs inspired NSW’s leaders to build the services which would enable working families to move out of slums into suburbs. The opening of the Paris Metro in 1900 and of Berlin’s in 1902 further inspired the city underground electric railway; the Bridge was a railways-plan which had no road tolls in its initial calculations; and rail electrification overall was based on the eugenics thinking. (Melbourne took many decades to replicate that inner metro.)

All initial road, rail, tram and water networks were built on a radial basis - strongly centred on the initial suburbs. The first planning inquiry, the Improvement Commission of 1908-09, reinforced that idea; but its primary motivation was to argue for Greater Sydney. In 1910 Sydney had over 40 municipal bodies; it still has.

The second inquiry and report, the Cumberland County Council’s Scheme in 1948, was inspired by London, to constrain development rather than spread over the plains, while transport bureaucrats were then proposing the transplantation of the tram system from the railway-serviced zones into railway-feeder zones (in the spirit of Zurich).

Advertisement

Land development was largely laissez-faire and privately-driven, limited more by the availability of water and sewerage. It was not until the Wran Government from 1976 that “planning” became based on “planning” as a legal and philosophical direction. Major land releases had happened throughout the century but intensified from the 1960s.

The later “necessity” elements included the Snowy hydro scheme; the expansion of Mascot Airport; the relocation of coal handling to Port Kembla and of containers to Botany Bay; the Ord River scheme; the construction of various universities and of various waste and nuclear facilities; and the redevelopment of old railway yards and workshops. Currently the national NBN expenditure of more than $40 billion is being justified as essential and necessary.

Planning to inspire

The “improvement” mentality of the early 1900s enraptured cities whose citizens were suffering the effects of industrialisation and municipal ineptitude. More than 50 million people attended the 1900 Paris Exhibition. Monumental schemes were developed in England, France, Germany, Russia, Japan and America, and elsewhere.

Royal Commissions in 1890 and 1896 and an independent inquiry in 1898 showed that while tram congestion was a critical concern, steam trains were unsuitable to run into the Sydney CBD.

The great Australian scheme was Sydney’s Improvement Commission with its parks, housing plans, transport schemes and the rest that pushed that city into world leadership. The planning focus became the provision of a modern electric train service in the suburbs and under the CBD and to the North Shore. Governments in the 1910s and especially Jack Lang’s in the 1920s committed to building the improvement scheme to the tune of £27 million (the Bridge accounting for just £10 million).

There was a land speculation boom in the 1920s which led to thousands of unsold houses in the 1930s. Tram patronage collapsed in the 1930s as the city changed.

Advertisement

Postwar Reconstruction brought a bloom of enthusiasm, driven by a belief in “planning” and the need for more suburbs and motor cars. Sydney City was campaigning for a “master plan”.

The Cumberland County Council scheme and the concurrent Main Roads Development Plan presaged a transport-driven metropolitan plan. Home ownership started to rise, producing Australia’s character statement of the quarter-acre block - based on the car. The nature of politics started to change, based on mortgages and consumer debt.

The scheme also produced major losers such as developers and fringe councils. The short-term demographic projections were too low. There was great pressure to drop the Green Belt and some land on the fringe was released between 1951 and 1959, with the sewerage backlog already growing by 6,500 homes a year. The 50-odd local councils were supposed to prepare planning schemes but only 3 did.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Robert Gibbons started urban studies at Sydney University in 1971 and has done major studies of Sydney, Chicago, world cities' performance indicators, regional infrastructure financing, and urban history. He has published major pieces on the failure of trams in Sydney, on the "improvement generation" in Sydney, and has two books in readiness for publication, Thank God for the Plague, Sydney 1900 to 1912 and Sydney's Stumbles. He has been Exec Director Planning in NSW DOT, General Manager of Newcastle City, director of AIUS NSW and advisor to several premiers and senior ministers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Robert Gibbons

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Robert Gibbons
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy